Literature DB >> 20200926

Efficacy of continued alendronate for fractures in women with and without prevalent vertebral fracture: the FLEX trial.

Ann V Schwartz1, Douglas C Bauer, Steven R Cummings, Jane A Cauley, Kristine E Ensrud, Lisa Palermo, Robert B Wallace, Marc C Hochberg, Adrianne C Feldstein, Antonio Lombardi, Dennis M Black.   

Abstract

In the Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT) Long Term Extension (FLEX) Trial, 10 years of alendronate (ALN) did not significantly reduce the risk of nonvertebral fractures (NVFs) compared with 5 years of ALN. Continuing ALN reduced the risk of clinical but not morphometric vertebral fractures regardless of baseline vertebral fracture status. In previous studies, ALN efficacy for NVF prevention in women without prevalent vertebral fracture was limited to those with femoral neck (FN) T-scores of -2.5 or less. To determine whether the effect of long-term ALN on fracture differs by vertebral fracture status and femoral neck (FN) T-score, we performed a post hoc analysis using FLEX data, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial among 1099 postmenopausal women originally randomized to ALN in the FIT with mean ALN use of 5 years. In the FLEX Trial, women were randomized to placebo (40%) or ALN 5 mg/day (30%) or ALN 10 mg/day (30%) for an additional 5 years. Among women without vertebral fracture at FLEX baseline (n = 720), continuation of ALN reduced NVF in women with FLEX baseline FN T-scores of -2.5 or less [relative risk (RR) = 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26-0.96] but not with T-scores of greater than -2.5 and -2 or less (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.37-1.66) or with T-scores of greater than -2 (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.75-2.66; p for interaction = .019). Continuing ALN for 10 years instead of stopping after 5 years reduces NVF risk in women without prevalent vertebral fracture whose FN T-scores, achieved after 5 years of ALN, are -2.5 or less but does not reduce risk of NVF in women whose T-scores are greater than -2. (c) 2010 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20200926     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  71 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Smita Nayak; Mark S Roberts; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Methods to examine the impact of compliance to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy on fracture risk: systematic review and recommendations.

Authors:  Milica Nikitovic; Daniel H Solomon; Suzanne M Cadarette
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 3.  Update in new medications for primary care.

Authors:  Gerald W Smetana; Jane S Sillman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Denosumab after 8 years.

Authors:  I R Reid
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Managing Osteoporosis in Patients on Long-Term Bisphosphonate Treatment: Report of a Task Force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Authors:  Robert A Adler; Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan; Douglas C Bauer; Pauline M Camacho; Bart L Clarke; Gregory A Clines; Juliet E Compston; Matthew T Drake; Beatrice J Edwards; Murray J Favus; Susan L Greenspan; Ross McKinney; Robert J Pignolo; Deborah E Sellmeyer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 6.  Osteoporosis Treatment: When to Discontinue and When to Re-start.

Authors:  Silvano Adami; Luca Idolazzi; Elena Fracassi; Davide Gatti; Maurizio Rossini
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 13.567

7.  Atypical femur fracture during bisphosphonate drug holiday: a case series.

Authors:  A J Lovy; S M Koehler; A Keswani; D Joseph; R Hasija; R Ghillani
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of bisphosphonate drug holidays on bone mineral density and osteoporotic fracture risk.

Authors:  S Nayak; S L Greenspan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Duration of Bisphosphonate Drug Holidays and Associated Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; Kenneth G Saag; Tarun Arora; Nicole C Wright; Huifeng Yun; Shanette Daigle; Robert Matthews; Elizabeth Delzell
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis: insights for clinicians.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.091

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.