Literature DB >> 20200809

Narrow band imaging for characterization of high grade dysplasia and specialized intestinal metaplasia in Barrett's esophagus: a meta-analysis.

J Mannath1, V Subramanian, C J Hawkey, K Ragunath.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Narrow band imaging (NBI), a novel endoscopic technique that highlights mucosal surface structures and microvasculature is increasingly advocated as a tool to detect and characterize neoplasia and intestinal metaplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of NBI with magnification for the diagnosis of high grade dysplasia (HGD) and specialized intestinal metaplasia (SIM) in patients with Barrett's esophagus.
METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of studies which compared NBI-based diagnosis of HGD and SIM with histopathology as the gold standard.
RESULTS: Eight studies including 446 patients with 2194 lesions met the inclusion criteria. For diagnosing HGD, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were 0.96 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.93-0.99), 0.94 (95 %CI 0.84-1.0), 342.49 (95 %CI 40.49 - 2896.89) and 0.99 (SE 0.01) on a per-lesion analysis with similar results on per-patient analysis.. For the characterization of SIM, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, and AUC were 0.95 (95 %CI 0.87-1.0), 0.65 (95 %CI 0.52-0.78), 37.53 (95 %CI 6.50-217.62) and 0.88 (SE 0.08) on a per-lesion analysis.
CONCLUSION: NBI with magnification is accurate with high diagnostic precision for diagnosis of HGD in Barrett's esophagus on the basis of irregular mucosal pit patterns and/or irregular microvasculature. NBI has high sensitivity but poor specificity for characterizing SIM. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart.New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20200809     DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1243949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  64 in total

1.  Medical and endoscopic management of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  K K Wang; J M Tian; E Gorospe; J Penfield; G Prasad; T Goddard; M Wongkeesong; N S Buttar; L Lutzke; S Krishnadath
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 2.  Advanced endoscopic imaging in Barrett's oesophagus: a review on current practice.

Authors:  Rajvinder Singh; SweeLin Chen Yi Mei; Sandeep Sethi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Endoscopy: NBI in Barrett esophagus--look more and sample less.

Authors:  Emmanuel C Gorospe; Kenneth K Wang
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  [Endourological imaging with narrow band imaging].

Authors:  C Doehn
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Barrett esophagus: an update.

Authors:  Rami J Badreddine; Kenneth K Wang
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 6.  Enhanced endoscopic imaging and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Rupa Banerjee; D Nageshwar Reddy
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-19

Review 7.  Use of in vivo real-time optical imaging for esophageal neoplasia.

Authors:  Peter M Vila; Nadhi Thekkek; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Sharmila Anandasabapathy
Journal:  Mt Sinai J Med       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec

8.  Era of Barrett's surveillance: does equipment matter?

Authors:  Jayan Mannath; Krish Ragunath
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Endoscopic options for early stage esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Pari M Shah; Hans Gerdes
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-02

Review 10.  Indications, stains and techniques in chromoendoscopy.

Authors:  P J Trivedi; B Braden
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2012-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.