CONTEXT: Abdominal fat contributes to anovulation. OBJECTIVE: We compared body fat distribution measurements and their contribution to anovulation in obese ovulatory and anovulatory infertile women. DESIGN: Seventeen ovulatory and 40 anovulatory women (age, 30 +/- 4 yr; body mass index, 37.7 +/- 6.1 kg/m(2)) participated. Body fat distribution was measured by anthropometrics, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and single-sliced abdominal computed tomography scan. Multiple logistic regression analysis was applied to determine which fat compartments significantly contributed to anovulation. RESULTS: Anovulatory women had a higher waist circumference (113 +/- 11 vs. 104 +/- 9 cm; P < 0.01) and significantly more trunk fat (23.0 +/- 5.3 vs. 19.1 +/- 4.2 kg; P < 0.01) and abdominal fat (4.4 +/- 1.3 kg vs. 3.5 +/- 0.9 kg; P < 0.05) on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scan than ovulatory women despite similar body mass index. The volume of intraabdominal fat on single-sliced abdominal computed tomography scan was not significantly different between the two groups (203 +/- 56 vs. 195 +/- 71 cm(3); P = 0.65), but anovulatory women had significantly more sc abdominal fat (SAF) (992 +/- 198 vs. 864 +/- 146 cm(3); P < 0.05). After multiple logistic regression analysis, only trunk fat, abdominal fat, and SAF were associated with anovulation. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal fat is increased in anovulatory women due to a significant increase in SAF and not in intraabdominal fat. SAF and especially abdominal and trunk fat accumulation are associated with anovulation.
CONTEXT: Abdominal fat contributes to anovulation. OBJECTIVE: We compared body fat distribution measurements and their contribution to anovulation in obese ovulatory and anovulatory infertile women. DESIGN: Seventeen ovulatory and 40 anovulatory women (age, 30 +/- 4 yr; body mass index, 37.7 +/- 6.1 kg/m(2)) participated. Body fat distribution was measured by anthropometrics, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and single-sliced abdominal computed tomography scan. Multiple logistic regression analysis was applied to determine which fat compartments significantly contributed to anovulation. RESULTS: Anovulatory women had a higher waist circumference (113 +/- 11 vs. 104 +/- 9 cm; P < 0.01) and significantly more trunk fat (23.0 +/- 5.3 vs. 19.1 +/- 4.2 kg; P < 0.01) and abdominal fat (4.4 +/- 1.3 kg vs. 3.5 +/- 0.9 kg; P < 0.05) on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scan than ovulatory women despite similar body mass index. The volume of intraabdominal fat on single-sliced abdominal computed tomography scan was not significantly different between the two groups (203 +/- 56 vs. 195 +/- 71 cm(3); P = 0.65), but anovulatory women had significantly more sc abdominal fat (SAF) (992 +/- 198 vs. 864 +/- 146 cm(3); P < 0.05). After multiple logistic regression analysis, only trunk fat, abdominal fat, and SAF were associated with anovulation. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal fat is increased in anovulatory women due to a significant increase in SAF and not in intraabdominal fat. SAF and especially abdominal and trunk fat accumulation are associated with anovulation.
Authors: Margaret C Garin; Samantha F Butts; David B Sarwer; Kelly C Allison; Suneeta Senapati; Anuja Dokras Journal: Endocrine Date: 2016-12-21 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Julia Kim; Caroline Juneau; George Patounakis; Scott Morin; Shelby Neal; Emre Seli; Richard Scott Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2020-08-22 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Dušan Fabian; Janka Kubandová-Babeľová; Martina Kšiňanová; Iveta Waczulíková; Kamila Fabianová; Juraj Koppel Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Richard S Legro; William C Dodson; Carol L Gnatuk; Stephanie J Estes; Allen R Kunselman; Juliana W Meadows; James S Kesner; Edward F Krieg; Ann M Rogers; Randy S Haluck; Robert N Cooney Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-10-12 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Christiane R Giviziez; Eliane G M Sanchez; Mário S Approbato; Monica C S Maia; Eliamar Aparecida B Fleury; Reinaldo S A Sasaki Journal: JBRA Assist Reprod Date: 2016-12-01
Authors: Joseph S Marino; Jeffrey Iler; Abigail R Dowling; Streamson Chua; Jens C Bruning; Roberto Coppari; Jennifer W Hill Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-10-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Cornelieke van de Beek; Annemieke Hoek; Rebecca C Painter; Reinoud J B J Gemke; Mireille N M van Poppel; Anouk Geelen; Henk Groen; Ben Willem Mol; Tessa J Roseboom Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 2.692