Colin R Simpson1, Aziz Sheikh. 1. Allergy & Respiratory Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Medical School (Doorway 3) Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK. c.simpson@ed.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Observations in the UK at the end of the last century found increasing trends of asthma prevalence over time. However, it has been reported that the number of new cases of asthma presenting to general practice has declined, especially among younger children. Aim To study national trends in the epidemiology of asthma. METHODS: A cross-sectional observation analysis was performed using the QRESEARCH database, which is one of the world's largest national aggregated health databases containing records from 422 English practices yielding 30 million patient-years of observation. Data was extracted on 333,294 individuals with a recorded diagnosis of asthma and calculated annual age-sex standardized incidence, lifetime period prevalence and asthma-related prescribing rates for each year from 2001-2005. RESULTS: The incidence rate of asthma decreased in all patients (2001: 6.9 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 6.8-7.0); 2005: 5.2 (95% CI 5.1-5.3) per 1000 patient-years, p<0.001), but most particularly in children under 5 years of age (-38.4%) where a decrease in the lifetime prevalence of asthma (-34.3%) was also found. However, the lifetime prevalence rate of asthma for adults increased (15-44 years: 23.3%; 45-64 years: 27.7%; >65 years: 21.5%) with an estimated 5,658,900 (95% CI 5,639,700-5,678,200) or approximately one person in nine having being diagnosed with asthma in England. The number of asthma-related prescriptions also increased over the study period (17.1%), such that in 2005 an estimated 32,577,300 (95%CI 32,531,600-32,623,000) prescriptions were issued. CONCLUSIONS: This large national study reveals that the rate of new diagnoses of asthma appears to have passed its peak; however, the number of adults with a lifetime asthma diagnosis continues to rise. Whether these trends are genuine or are a result of the introduction of incentives and guidelines to improve identification and recording of asthma or changing diagnostic trends is a question with important public health implications and one, therefore, that warrants detailed further enquiry.
BACKGROUND: Observations in the UK at the end of the last century found increasing trends of asthma prevalence over time. However, it has been reported that the number of new cases of asthma presenting to general practice has declined, especially among younger children. Aim To study national trends in the epidemiology of asthma. METHODS: A cross-sectional observation analysis was performed using the QRESEARCH database, which is one of the world's largest national aggregated health databases containing records from 422 English practices yielding 30 million patient-years of observation. Data was extracted on 333,294 individuals with a recorded diagnosis of asthma and calculated annual age-sex standardized incidence, lifetime period prevalence and asthma-related prescribing rates for each year from 2001-2005. RESULTS: The incidence rate of asthma decreased in all patients (2001: 6.9 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 6.8-7.0); 2005: 5.2 (95% CI 5.1-5.3) per 1000 patient-years, p<0.001), but most particularly in children under 5 years of age (-38.4%) where a decrease in the lifetime prevalence of asthma (-34.3%) was also found. However, the lifetime prevalence rate of asthma for adults increased (15-44 years: 23.3%; 45-64 years: 27.7%; >65 years: 21.5%) with an estimated 5,658,900 (95% CI 5,639,700-5,678,200) or approximately one person in nine having being diagnosed with asthma in England. The number of asthma-related prescriptions also increased over the study period (17.1%), such that in 2005 an estimated 32,577,300 (95%CI 32,531,600-32,623,000) prescriptions were issued. CONCLUSIONS: This large national study reveals that the rate of new diagnoses of asthma appears to have passed its peak; however, the number of adults with a lifetime asthma diagnosis continues to rise. Whether these trends are genuine or are a result of the introduction of incentives and guidelines to improve identification and recording of asthma or changing diagnostic trends is a question with important public health implications and one, therefore, that warrants detailed further enquiry.
Authors: Tricia M McKeever; Sarah A Lewis; Chris Smith; Juliet Collins; Heath Heatlie; Martin Frischer; Richard Hubbard Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Shih-Feng Chiu; Christina M L Kelton; Jeff Jianfei Guo; Patricia R Wigle; Alex C Lin; Sheryl L Szeinbach Journal: Am Health Drug Benefits Date: 2011-05
Authors: Colin R Simpson; Nazir I Lone; Kim Kavanagh; Tanya Englishby; Chris Robertson; Jim McMenamin; Beatrix von Wissman; Eleftheria Vasileiou; Christopher C Butler; Lewis D Ritchie; Rory Gunson; Jürgen Schwarze; Aziz Sheikh Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Nick C Matthews; Paul E Pfeffer; Elizabeth H Mann; Frank J Kelly; Christopher J Corrigan; Catherine M Hawrylowicz; Tak H Lee Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 6.914
Authors: Sooky Lum; Vassiliki Bountziouka; Samatha Sonnappa; Angie Wade; Tim J Cole; Seeromanie Harding; Jonathan C K Wells; Chris Griffiths; Philip Treleaven; Rachel Bonner; Jane Kirkby; Simon Lee; Emma Raywood; Sarah Legg; Dave Sears; Philippa Cottam; Colin Feyeraband; Janet Stocks Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 16.671