Literature DB >> 20199535

Determination of the optimal stylet strategy for the C-MAC videolaryngoscope.

J McElwain1, M A Malik, B H Harte, N H Flynn, J G Laffey.   

Abstract

The C-MAC videolaryngoscope is a novel intubation device that incorporates a camera system at the end of its blade, thereby facilitating obtaining a view of the glottis without alignment of the oral, pharyngeal and tracheal axes. It retains the traditional Macintosh blade shape and can be used as a direct or indirect laryngoscope. We wished to determine the optimal stylet strategy for use with the C-MAC. Ten anaesthetists were allowed up to three attempts to intubate the trachea in one easy and three progressively more difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in a SimMan manikin with four tracheal tube stylet strategies: no stylet; stylet; directional stylet (Parker Flex-It); and hockey-stick stylet. The use of a stylet conferred no advantage in the easy laryngoscopy scenario. In the difficult scenarios, the directional and hockey-stick stylets performed best. In the most difficult scenario, the median (IQR [range]) duration of the successful intubation attempt was lowest with the hockey-stick stylet; 18 s (15-22 [12-43]) s, highest with the unstyletted tracheal tube; 60 s (60-60 [60, 60]) s and styletted tracheal tube 60 s (29-60 [18-60]) s, and intermediate with the directional stylet 21 s (15-60 [8-60]) s. The use of a stylet alone does not confer benefit in the setting of easy laryngoscopy. However, in more difficult laryngoscopy scenarios, the C-MAC videolaryngoscope performs best when used with a stylet that angulates the distal tracheal tube. The hockey-stick stylet configuration performed best in the scenarios tested.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20199535     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06245.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  16 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of C-MAC videolaryngoscope with or without use of stylet for endotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization.

Authors:  Nidhi Gupta; Girija Prasad Rath; Hemanshu Prabhakar
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  The role of tracheal tube introducers and stylets in current airway management.

Authors:  Sina Grape; Patrick Schoettker
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Development of endotracheal intubation devices for patients with tumors.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Yang Zhang; Bin Zhu; Wenyun Xu; Yi Yang; Zui Zou
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 5.942

4.  Comparison of the C-MAC D-Blade, Conventional C-MAC, and Macintosh Laryngoscopes in Simulated Easy and Difficult Airways.

Authors:  Alper Kılıçaslan; Ahmet Topal; Atilla Erol; Sema Tuncer Uzun
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2014-08-01

5.  Parker Flex-It stylet is as effective as GlideRite Rigid stylet for orotracheal intubation by Glidescope.

Authors:  Saad A Sheta; Ashraf A Abdelhalim; Ismail A ElZoughari; Tariq A AlZahrani; Abdulhamid H Al-Saeed
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.484

6.  Comparing McGRATH® MAC, C-MAC®, and Macintosh Laryngoscopes Operated by Medical Students: A Randomized, Crossover, Manikin Study.

Authors:  Myungju Shin; Sun Joon Bai; Ki-Young Lee; Ein Oh; Hyun Joo Kim
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Stylet angulation for routine endotracheal intubation with McGrath videolaryngoscope.

Authors:  Jiyoung Lee; Jong Yeop Kim; Se Yoon Kang; Hyun Jeong Kwak; Dongchul Lee; Sook Young Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Postoperative sore throat and subglottic injury after McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscopic intubation with versus without a stylet in patients with a high Mallampati score: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hyun-Kyu Yoon; Hyung-Chul Lee; Hyongmin Oh; Kwanghoon Jun; Hee-Pyoung Park
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  Comparison of endotracheal intubation time in neutral position between C-Mac® and Airtraq® laryngoscopes: A prospective randomised study.

Authors:  Syed Moied Ahmed; Kashmiri Doley; Manazir Athar; Nadeem Raza; Obaid Ahmad Siddiqi; Shahna Ali
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2017-04

10.  Comparing performance of McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope in morbidly obese and nonobese patients

Authors:  Ying Gao; Liu-Jia-Zi Shao; Fushan Xue
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 0.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.