Literature DB >> 20199372

An ex-vivo model for hypothermic pulsatile perfusion of porcine pancreata: hemodynamic and morphologic characteristics.

Marcin Karcz1, H Terence Cook, Paul Sibbons, Cathy Gray, Anthony Dorling, Vassilios Papalois.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Hypothermic machine perfusion is a well-established preservation method for kidneys that allows for better preservation over longer periods and pretransplant assessment of graft viability. This technique has only sporadically been used for pancreatic grafts. The aim of this study was to establish a hypothermic machine perfusion model for porcine pancreas perfusion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen porcine pancreata were subjected to 25 minutes of warm ischemia and 149 minutes of cold ischemia before undergoing meticulous bench work preparation and perfusion, via an aortic segment, on the RM3 perfusion machine with University of Wisconsin (Barr Laboratories Inc., Pomona, NY, USA) solution. Perfusion variables (degrees C, temperature; mm Hg, systolic perfusion pressure; mL/min, flow volume; mm Hg/mL/min, resistance) were recorded every 30 minutes. Tissue samples were assessed for each pancreas preperfusion and postperfusion using a semiquantitative scoring scale to grade histopathologic changes: acinar cell damage (0-4), islet cell damage (0-3), inflammation (0-3), and edema (0-3).
RESULTS: Hypothermic machine perfusion time was set at 315 minutes, and all grafts were maintained between 4-10 degrees C. The results were as follows (range, mean -/+ SD): systolic perfusion pressures were 5-13 mm Hg (9.61 -/+ 3.25 mm Hg) during the first 60 minutes (priming), and 15-23 mm Hg (21.07 -/+ 4.26 mm Hg) during the maintenance period. Target flow volumes reached 141-152 mL/min (147.6 -/+ 8.969 mL/min) at 60 pulses per minute. Intrapancreatic resistance decreased throughout priming to 0.03-0.09 mm Hg/mL/min (0.083 -/+ 0.042 mm Hg/mL/min), and remained unchanged until completion of perfusion. Pancreatic weight increase varied from 3.2% to 18.3% (13.36% -/+ 4.961%). There was significant postperfusion reduction in islet and acinar cell damage (P = .001 and P = .01 respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a model of machine perfusion for porcine pancreata which is simple, reliable, and protects graft histopathologic integrity. The model can be used in further studies to improve the quality of pancreas preservation, and assess and improve the viability of the condition of borderline pancreatic grafts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20199372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Transplant        ISSN: 1304-0855            Impact factor:   0.945


  9 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing organs for transplantation; advancements in perfusion and preservation methods.

Authors:  Elizabeth Soo; Christopher Marsh; Robert Steiner; Lisa Stocks; Dianne B McKay
Journal:  Transplant Rev (Orlando)       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.943

2.  Ex situ Perfusion of Pancreas for Whole-Organ Transplantation: Is it Safe and Feasible? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Thomas Prudhomme; Delphine Kervella; Stéphanie Le Bas-Bernardet; Diego Cantarovich; Georges Karam; Gilles Blancho; Julien Branchereau
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-08-13

3.  Hypothermic machine perfusion after static cold storage improves ovarian function in rat ovarian tissue transplantation.

Authors:  Shichen Zhang; Hanlin Yao; Yang Liu; Lian Ren; Du Xiang; Yanfeng Wang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Use of Ex Vivo Normothermic Perfusion for Quality Assessment of Discarded Human Donor Pancreases.

Authors:  A D Barlow; M O Hamed; D H Mallon; R J Brais; F M Gribble; M A Scott; W J Howat; J A Bradley; E M Bolton; G J Pettigrew; S A Hosgood; M L Nicholson; K Saeb-Parsy
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Hypothermic Oxygenated Machine Perfusion of the Human Donor Pancreas.

Authors:  Marjolein Leemkuil; Grietje Lier; Marten A Engelse; Rutger J Ploeg; Eelco J P de Koning; Nils A 't Hart; Christina Krikke; Henri G D Leuvenink
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2018-09-07

Review 6.  Pancreas Transplantation from Donors after Circulatory Death: an Irrational Reluctance?

Authors:  M Leemkuil; H G D Leuvenink; R A Pol
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 7.  Transplanting Marginal Organs in the Era of Modern Machine Perfusion and Advanced Organ Monitoring.

Authors:  Thomas Resch; Benno Cardini; Rupert Oberhuber; Annemarie Weissenbacher; Julia Dumfarth; Christoph Krapf; Claudia Boesmueller; Dietmar Oefner; Michael Grimm; Sefan Schneeberger
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 8.  Ischemia-Reperfusion Injuries Assessment during Pancreas Preservation.

Authors:  Thomas Prudhomme; John F Mulvey; Liam A J Young; Benoit Mesnard; Maria Letizia Lo Faro; Ann Etohan Ogbemudia; Fungai Dengu; Peter J Friend; Rutger Ploeg; James P Hunter; Julien Branchereau
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Machine Perfusion of Extended Criteria Donor Organs: Immunological Aspects.

Authors:  Mindaugas Kvietkauskas; Bettina Leber; Kestutis Strupas; Philipp Stiegler; Peter Schemmer
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 7.561

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.