Literature DB >> 20199230

Effectiveness and safety of fentanyl compared with morphine for out-of-hospital analgesia.

Ross J Fleischman1, David G Frazer, Mohamud Daya, Jonathan Jui, Craig D Newgard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fentanyl has several potential advantages for out-of-hospital analgesia, including rapid onset, short duration, and less histamine release. Objective. To compare the effectiveness and safety of fentanyl with that of morphine.
METHODS: This was a retrospective before-and-after study of a protocol change from morphine to fentanyl in an advanced life support emergency medical services system in January 2007. Charts from nine months prior to the change and for nine months afterward were abstracted by two reviewers using a standardized instrument. The first three months after the change were excluded. Effectiveness was measured by change in pain scores on a 0-10 scale. A priori-defined adverse events included out-of-hospital events: respiratory rate <12 breaths/min, pulse oximetry <92%, systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, any fall in Glasgow Coma Scale score, nausea or vomiting, intubation, and use of antiemetic agents or naloxone. Emergency department charts were reviewed for initial pain scores and the same adverse events during the first two hours. Events clearly not attributable to the opioid were discounted. The changes in pain scores were also compared adjusting for confounders by multivariable linear regression.
RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-five patients aged 13 to 99 years received morphine during the nine months before the protocol change and 363 received fentanyl following the washout period. Initial pain scores for morphine (8.1) and fentanyl (8.3) were comparable (95% confidence interval [CI] for difference -1.1 to 0.3). Fentanyl patients received a higher equivalent dose of opioid (7.7 mg morphine equivalents for morphine, 9.2 mg for fentanyl, CI for the difference 0.9 to 2.3). The mean decreases in pain score were similar between the drugs (2.9 for morphine, 3.1 for fentanyl, CI for the difference -0.3 to 0.7). With regard to adverse events, 9.9% of the morphine patients and 6.6% of the fentanyl patients experienced an adverse event in the field (CI for the difference -0.8 to 7.3%). The most common event was nausea, with a rate of 7.0% for morphine vs. 3.8% for fentanyl (CI for the difference -0.1% to 6.5%).
CONCLUSION: Morphine and fentanyl provide similar degrees of out-of-hospital analgesia, although this was achieved with a higher dose of fentanyl. Both medications had low rates of adverse events, which were easily controlled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20199230      PMCID: PMC2924527          DOI: 10.3109/10903120903572301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  18 in total

1.  Prehospital pain management.

Authors:  Héctor M Alonso-Serra; Keith Wesley
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2003 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.077

Review 2.  Inadequate analgesia in emergency medicine.

Authors:  Timothy Rupp; Kathleen A Delaney
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Appeal for fentanyl prehospital use.

Authors:  Darren Braude; Michael Richards
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.077

4.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; M A Ciol
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Advanced statistics: missing data in clinical research--part 2: multiple imputation.

Authors:  Craig D Newgard; Jason S Haukoos
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Evaluation of morphine versus fentanyl for postoperative analgesia after ambulatory surgical procedures.

Authors:  A R Claxton; G McGuire; F Chung; C Cruise
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Comparison of alfentanil and morphine in the prehospital treatment of patients with acute ischaemic-type chest pain.

Authors:  T Silfvast; L Saarnivaara
Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.799

8.  Comparative study of methods of measuring acute pain intensity in an ED.

Authors:  F Berthier; G Potel; P Leconte; M D Touze; D Baron
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.469

9.  The feasibility of pain assessment in the prehospital setting.

Authors:  Samuel A McLean; Robert M Domeier; Heather K DeVore; Elizabeth M Hill; Ronald F Maio; Shirley M Frederiksen
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2004 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.077

10.  Prehospital fentanyl analgesia in air-transported pediatric trauma patients.

Authors:  P DeVellis; S H Thomas; S K Wedel; J P Stein; R J Vinci
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.454

View more
  8 in total

1.  Administration of intravenous morphine for acute pain in the emergency department inflicts an economic burden in Europe.

Authors:  Montserrat Casamayor; Karen DiDonato; Marc Hennebert; Luca Brazzi; Gregor Prosen
Journal:  Drugs Context       Date:  2018-04-11

2.  Prehospital intravenous fentanyl administered by ambulance personnel: a cluster-randomised comparison of two treatment protocols.

Authors:  Kristian D Friesgaard; Hans Kirkegaard; Claus-Henrik Rasmussen; Matthias Giebner; Erika F Christensen; Lone Nikolajsen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Intranasal sufentanil versus intravenous morphine for acute severe trauma pain: A double-blind randomized non-inferiority study.

Authors:  Marc Blancher; Maxime Maignan; Cyrielle Clapé; Jean-Louis Quesada; Roselyne Collomb-Muret; François Albasini; François-Xavier Ageron; Stephanie Fey; Audrey Wuyts; Jean-Jacques Banihachemi; Barthelemy Bertrand; Audrey Lehmann; Claire Bollart; Guillaume Debaty; Raphaël Briot; Damien Viglino
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 11.069

4.  Impact of Intrathecal Fentanyl on Hospital Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With Neuraxial Anesthesia.

Authors:  McKayla Kelly; Justin Turcotte; Jacob Aja; James MacDonald; Paul King
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-04-14

5.  Can ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block be an alternative option for forearm reduction in the emergency department? A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Erdal Tekin; Muhammed Enes Aydin; Mehmet Cenk Turgut; Selahattin Karagoz; Irem Ates; Elif Oral Ahiskalioglu
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2021-12-31

6.  Evaluation of a clinical protocol using intranasal fentanyl for treatment of vaso-occlusive crisis in sickle cell patients in the emergency department.

Authors:  Hugo Paquin; Evelyne D Trottier; Yves Pastore; Nancy Robitaille; Marie-Joelle Dore Bergeron; Benoit Bailey
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 7.  Analgesia in the emergency department: a GRADE-based evaluation of research evidence and recommendations for practice.

Authors:  Chris Lipp; Raj Dhaliwal; Eddy Lang
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 8.  Opioids for Treatment of Pre-hospital Acute Pain: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kristian Dahl Friesgaard; Gunn Elisabeth Vist; Per Kristian Hyldmo; Lasse Raatiniemi; Jouni Kurola; Robert Larsen; Poul Kongstad; Vidar Magnusson; Mårten Sandberg; Marius Rehn; Leif Rognås
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2022-01-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.