Literature DB >> 20198521

Using enzymes to remove biofilms of bacterial isolates sampled in the food-industry.

Yannick Lequette1, Gauthier Boels, Martine Clarisse, Christine Faille.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the cleaning efficiency of polysaccharidases and proteolytic enzymes against biofilms of bacterial species found in food industry processing lines and to study enzyme effects on the composition of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and biofilm removal in a Clean-in-Place (CIP) procedure. The screening of 7 proteases and polysaccharidases for removal of biofilms of 16 bacterial species was first evaluated using a microtiter plate assay. The alkaline pH buffer removed more biofilm biomass as well as affecting a larger range of bacterial species. The two serine proteases and alpha-amylase were the most efficient enzymes. Proteolytic enzymes promoted biofilm removal of a larger range of bacterial species than polysaccharidases. Using three isolates derived from two bacterial species widely found in food processing lines (Pseudomonas fluorescens and the Bacillus cereus group), biofilms were developed on stainless steel slides and enzymatic solutions were used to remove the biofilms using CIP procedure. Serine proteases were more efficient in removing cells of Bacillus biofilms than polysaccharidases. However, polysaccharidases were more efficient in removing P. fluorescens biofilms than serine proteases. Solubilization of enzymes with a buffer containing surfactants, and dispersing and chelating agents enhanced the efficiency of polysaccharidases and proteases respectively in removing biofilms of Bacillus and P. fluorescens. A combination of enzymes targeting several components of EPS, surfactants, dispersing and chelating agents would be an efficient alternative to chemical cleaning agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20198521     DOI: 10.1080/08927011003699535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofouling        ISSN: 0892-7014            Impact factor:   3.209


  26 in total

1.  Immobilized Hydrolytic Enzymes Exhibit Antibiofilm Activity Against Escherichia coli at Sub-Lethal Concentrations.

Authors:  Federica Villa; Francesco Secundo; Andrea Polo; Francesca Cappitelli
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Degradation of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Using Hydrolytic Enzymes Produced by Amazonian Endophytic Fungi.

Authors:  Rosiane Rodrigues Matias; Ana Milena Gómez Sepúlveda; Bárbara Nunes Batista; Juliana Mesquita Vidal Martínez de Lucena; Patrícia Melchionna Albuquerque
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.926

3.  Role of PBPD1 in stimulation of Listeria monocytogenes biofilm formation by subminimal inhibitory β-lactam concentrations.

Authors:  Uyen T Nguyen; Hanjeong Harvey; Andrew J Hogan; Alexandria C F Afonso; Gerard D Wright; Lori L Burrows
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Targeting microbial biofilms using Ficin, a nonspecific plant protease.

Authors:  Diana R Baidamshina; Elena Y Trizna; Marina G Holyavka; Mikhail I Bogachev; Valeriy G Artyukhov; Farida S Akhatova; Elvira V Rozhina; Rawil F Fakhrullin; Airat R Kayumov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  In vitro characterization of biofilms formed by Kingella kingae.

Authors:  J B Kaplan; V Sampathkumar; M Bendaoud; A K Giannakakis; E T Lally; N V Balashova
Journal:  Mol Oral Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 3.563

Review 6.  Hurdle technology using encapsulated enzymes and essential oils to fight bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Samah Mechmechani; Simon Khelissa; Adem Gharsallaoui; Khaled El Omari; Monzer Hamze; Nour-Eddine Chihib
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  A halotolerant thermostable lipase from the marine bacterium Oceanobacillus sp. PUMB02 with an ability to disrupt bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  George Seghal Kiran; Anuj Nishanth Lipton; Jonathan Kennedy; Alan D W Dobson; Joseph Selvin
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.269

Review 8.  Biophysics of biofilm infection.

Authors:  Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 9.  Amylases: Biofilm Inducer or Biofilm Inhibitor?

Authors:  Dibyajit Lahiri; Moupriya Nag; Ritwik Banerjee; Dipro Mukherjee; Sayantani Garai; Tanmay Sarkar; Ankita Dey; Hassan I Sheikh; Sushil Kumar Pathak; Hisham Atan Edinur; Siddhartha Pati; Rina Rani Ray
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 5.293

10.  The Use of Commercially Available Alpha-Amylase Compounds to Inhibit and Remove Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms.

Authors:  Bradford Craigen; Aliza Dashiff; Daniel E Kadouri
Journal:  Open Microbiol J       Date:  2011-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.