Literature DB >> 20198381

Imaging results in a consecutive series of 530 new patients in the Birmingham Headache Service.

C E Clarke1, J Edwards, D J Nicholl, A Sivaguru.   

Abstract

Guidelines recommend imaging only headache patients with sinister features in the history or on examination. We prospectively collected data on imaging newly presenting patients to a UK headache service. CT and MRI results were classified as normal or showing an insignificant or significant abnormality. Over 5 years, 3,655 new patients (69% female; mean age 42.0 years) with headache disorders were seen. Five hundred thirty (14.5%) underwent imaging with large differences in the proportion referred by each consultant. There were more insignificant abnormalities on MRI (46%) than CT (28%). There were 11 significantly abnormal results (2.1% of those imaged). Significant abnormalities were found in patients diagnosed with migraine in 1.2% and in 0.9% of those with tension-type headache. Significant abnormalities in those suspected to have an intracranial abnormality occurred in 5.5%. This supports the practice of selecting patients with suspicious findings for imaging, rather than imaging all patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20198381     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-010-5506-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  6 in total

1.  The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.292

2.  Neuroimaging in the evaluation of patients with non-acute headache.

Authors:  A P Sempere; J Porta-Etessam; V Medrano; I Garcia-Morales; L Concepción; A Ramos; I Florencio; F Bermejo; C Botella
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.292

3.  Ability of a nurse specialist to diagnose simple headache disorders compared with consultant neurologists.

Authors:  C E Clarke; J Edwards; D J Nicholl; A Sivaguru; P Davies; C Wiskin
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Are investigations anxiolytic or anxiogenic? A randomised controlled trial of neuroimaging to provide reassurance in chronic daily headache.

Authors:  L Howard; S Wessely; M Leese; L Page; P McCrone; K Husain; J Tong; A Dowson
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Imaging patients with suspected brain tumour: guidance for primary care.

Authors:  David P Kernick; Fayyaz Ahmed; Anish Bahra; Andrew Dowson; Giles Elrington; Manuela Fontebasso; Nicola J Giffin; Sue Lipscombe; Anne MacGregor; Richard Peatfield; Stuart Weatherby; Tom Whitmarsh; Peter J Goadsby
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zoe Morris; William N Whiteley; W T Longstreth; Frank Weber; Yi-Chung Lee; Yoshito Tsushima; Hannah Alphs; Susanne C Ladd; Charles Warlow; Joanna M Wardlaw; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-08-17
  6 in total
  14 in total

Review 1.  It IS a tumor -- current review of headache and brain tumor.

Authors:  Kevin Kahn; Alan Finkel
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-06

2.  Should GPs have direct access to neuroradiological investigation when adults present with headache?

Authors:  David Kernick; Stuart Williams
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Headaches and neuroimaging: high utilization and costs despite guidelines.

Authors:  Brian C Callaghan; Kevin A Kerber; Robert J Pace; Lesli E Skolarus; James F Burke
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Headache neuroimaging: Routine testing when guidelines recommend against them.

Authors:  Brian C Callaghan; Kevin A Kerber; Robert J Pace; Lesli Skolarus; Wade Cooper; James F Burke
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 6.292

Review 5.  Headache and vasculitis.

Authors:  J Ivan Lopez; Ashley Holdridge; Julio Chalela
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2013-03

6.  Differences in Outcomes Associated With Individual Radiologists for Emergency Department Patients With Headache Imaged With CT: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 25,596 Patients.

Authors:  Matthew S Davenport; Shokoufeh Khalatbari; Nahid Keshavarzi; Michael Connolly; Keith E Kocher; Suzanne T Chong; Ashok Srinivasan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Why do GPs with a special interest in headache investigate headache presentations with neuroradiology and what do they find?

Authors:  Steven Elliot; David Kernick
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 7.277

Review 8.  Red and orange flags for secondary headaches in clinical practice: SNNOOP10 list.

Authors:  Thien Phu Do; Angelique Remmers; Henrik Winther Schytz; Christoph Schankin; Sarah E Nelson; Mark Obermann; Jakob Møller Hansen; Alexandra J Sinclair; Andreas R Gantenbein; Guus G Schoonman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 11.800

9.  Headache neuroimaging: A survey of current practice, barriers, and facilitators to optimal use.

Authors:  Evan L Reynolds; James F Burke; Lacey Evans; Faiz I Syed; Eric Liao; Remy Lobo; Wade Cooper; Larry Charleston; Brian C Callaghan
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 5.311

10.  P023. Reasons for headache investigation and findings in an experimental headache center.

Authors:  Alessandro Panconesi; Maria L Bartolozzi; Leonello Guidi; Sandro Santini; Nedo Mennuti; Vincenzo Carini
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.