OBJECTIVE: To analyze the relation of medication, compliance and persistence with the risk of the first hypertension associated event in naïve hypertensive patients after initiating monotherapy with any of the first-line antihypertensive drug classes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study in the IMS Disease Analyzer database was performed. The study cohort comprised all previously untreated hypertensive patients who were free from hypertension-associated comorbidities, in whom new monotherapy with angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), ACE-inhibitors (ACEIs), beta-blockers (BBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs) or diuretics was initiated. Compliance and persistence were determined within 2 years. The relation between medication, compliance, persistence and risk of the first hypertension-associated event was analyzed using a Cox regression model. Outcomes in the ARB cohort were compared with outcomes in each other drug class cohort separately and with outcomes in the group of non-ARBs (pooled data). RESULTS: 7,661 patients were identified with a follow-up of at least 2 years (totaling 45,585 patient-years of follow-up). ARBs were associated with more favorable measures (all p < 0.05) of compliance (0.86 vs. 0.82 and 0.74, respectively) and persistence (509 days vs. 459 and 324 days) compared with the group of non-ARBs and diuretics, respectively. The risk of the first hypertension-associated event was higher (all p < 0.05) with diuretics (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.68), BBs (0.79), CCBs (0.78), and the group of non-ARBs (0.81) and was similar with ACEIs (aHR 0.93, p = 0.37) compared to ARBs. Overall, high compliance was associated with a reduced risk of the first event (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our real-world data suggest that initiating a treatment with ARB monotherapy shows significant benefits in most outcomes including hypertension-related complications compared to other antihypertensive drug monotherapies. The documented impact of compliance on the risk of the first event should have clinical and policy implications.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the relation of medication, compliance and persistence with the risk of the first hypertension associated event in naïve hypertensivepatients after initiating monotherapy with any of the first-line antihypertensive drug classes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study in the IMS Disease Analyzer database was performed. The study cohort comprised all previously untreated hypertensivepatients who were free from hypertension-associated comorbidities, in whom new monotherapy with angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), ACE-inhibitors (ACEIs), beta-blockers (BBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs) or diuretics was initiated. Compliance and persistence were determined within 2 years. The relation between medication, compliance, persistence and risk of the first hypertension-associated event was analyzed using a Cox regression model. Outcomes in the ARB cohort were compared with outcomes in each other drug class cohort separately and with outcomes in the group of non-ARBs (pooled data). RESULTS: 7,661 patients were identified with a follow-up of at least 2 years (totaling 45,585 patient-years of follow-up). ARBs were associated with more favorable measures (all p < 0.05) of compliance (0.86 vs. 0.82 and 0.74, respectively) and persistence (509 days vs. 459 and 324 days) compared with the group of non-ARBs and diuretics, respectively. The risk of the first hypertension-associated event was higher (all p < 0.05) with diuretics (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.68), BBs (0.79), CCBs (0.78), and the group of non-ARBs (0.81) and was similar with ACEIs (aHR 0.93, p = 0.37) compared to ARBs. Overall, high compliance was associated with a reduced risk of the first event (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our real-world data suggest that initiating a treatment with ARB monotherapy shows significant benefits in most outcomes including hypertension-related complications compared to other antihypertensive drug monotherapies. The documented impact of compliance on the risk of the first event should have clinical and policy implications.
Authors: Jürgen Scholze; Eduardo Alegria; Claudio Ferri; Sue Langham; Warren Stevens; David Jeffries; Kerstin Uhl-Hochgraeber Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-09-02 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Peter Bramlage; Wolf-Peter Wolf; Thomas Stuhr; Eva-Maria Fronk; Wolfhard Erdlenbruch; Reinhard Ketelhut; Roland E Schmieder Journal: Vasc Health Risk Manag Date: 2010-09-07
Authors: Roland E Schmieder; Christian Ott; Axel Schmid; Stefanie Friedrich; Iris Kistner; Tilmann Ditting; Roland Veelken; Michael Uder; Stefan W Toennes Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 5.501