Literature DB >> 20196754

Informative or noninformative calls for gene expression: a latent variable approach.

Adetayo Kasim1, Dan Lin, Suzy Van Sanden, Djork-Arné Clevert, Luc Bijnens, Hinrich Göhlmann, Dhammika Amaratunga, Sepp Hochreiter, Ziv Shkedy, Willem Talloen.   

Abstract

The strength and weakness of microarray technology can be attributed to the enormous amount of information it is generating. To fully enhance the benefit of microarray technology for testing differentially expressed genes and classification, there is a need to minimize the amount of irrelevant genes present in microarray data. A major interest is to use probe-level data to call genes informative or noninformative based on the trade-off between the array-to-array variability and the measurement error. Existing works in this direction include filtering likely uninformative sets of hybridization (FLUSH; Calza et al., 2007) and I/NI calls for the exclusion of noninformative genes using FARMS (I/NI calls; Talloen et al., 2007; Hochreiter et al., 2006). In this paper, we propose a linear mixed model as a more flexible method that performs equally good as I/NI calls and outperforms FLUSH. We also introduce other criteria for gene filtering, such as, R2 and intra-cluster correlation. Additionally, we include some objective criteria based on likelihood ratio testing, the Akaike information criteria (AIC; Akaike, 1973) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC; Schwarz, 1978 ). Based on the HGU-133A Spiked-in data set, it is shown that the linear mixed model approach outperforms FLUSH, a method that filters genes based on a quantile regression. The linear model is equivalent to a factor analysis model when either the factor loadings are set to a constant with the variance of the latent factor equal to one, or if the factor loadings are set to one together with unconstrained variance of the latent factor. Filtering based on conditional variance calls a probe set informative when the intensity of one or more probes is consistent across the arrays, while filtering using R2 or intra-cluster correlation calls a probe set informative only when average intensity of a probe set is consistent across the arrays. Filtering based on likelihood ratio test AIC and BIC are less stringent compared to the other criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20196754     DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol        ISSN: 1544-6115


  4 in total

1.  Joint analysis of transcriptional and post- transcriptional brain tumor data: searching for emergent properties of cellular systems.

Authors:  Raffaele Fronza; Michele Tramonti; William R Atchley; Christine Nardini
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  A random effects model for the identification of differential splicing (REIDS) using exon and HTA arrays.

Authors:  Marijke Van Moerbeke; Adetayo Kasim; Willem Talloen; Joke Reumers; Hinrick W H Göhlmann; Ziv Shkedy
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  The Usage of Exon-Exon Splice Junctions for the Detection of Alternative Splicing using the REIDS model.

Authors:  Marijke Van Moerbeke; Adetayo Kasim; Ziv Shkedy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Identification of in vitro and in vivo disconnects using transcriptomic data.

Authors:  Martin Otava; Ziv Shkedy; Willem Talloen; Geert R Verheyen; Adetayo Kasim
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.969

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.