Kliment Donev1, Bernd W Scheithauer. 1. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Pseudoneoplasms of the nervous system vary greatly in nature. Ranging from inflammatory to autoimmune, infectious, malformative, reactive, degenerative, and radiation induced, they all mimic true tumors. Thus, they have the potential to mislead clinicians, radiologists, and pathologists alike. Their clinical and/or neuroimaging and histologic features are readily misinterpreted as tumor. Knowledge of the pitfalls is essential to avoid mismanagement, specifically overtreatment. In such instances, pathologists must take the entire clinical picture into consideration, acquainting themselves with presenting symptoms, physical findings, and neuroimaging. OBJECTIVE: To present 10 examples of pseudoneoplasms of the nervous system, analyze the basis for their mimicry, and discuss their differential diagnosis. DATA SOURCES: Review of the pertinent literature related to pseudoneoplasms of the nervous system and review of the consultation files of one of the authors (B.W.S.). CONCLUSIONS: The identification of tumor mimics may be difficult under the best of circumstances, and maintaining a broad differential diagnosis as well as application of a variety of immunocytochemical and occasionally ultrastructural and/or molecular genetic methods is essential to arrive at a correct diagnosis.
CONTEXT: Pseudoneoplasms of the nervous system vary greatly in nature. Ranging from inflammatory to autoimmune, infectious, malformative, reactive, degenerative, and radiation induced, they all mimic true tumors. Thus, they have the potential to mislead clinicians, radiologists, and pathologists alike. Their clinical and/or neuroimaging and histologic features are readily misinterpreted as tumor. Knowledge of the pitfalls is essential to avoid mismanagement, specifically overtreatment. In such instances, pathologists must take the entire clinical picture into consideration, acquainting themselves with presenting symptoms, physical findings, and neuroimaging. OBJECTIVE: To present 10 examples of pseudoneoplasms of the nervous system, analyze the basis for their mimicry, and discuss their differential diagnosis. DATA SOURCES: Review of the pertinent literature related to pseudoneoplasms of the nervous system and review of the consultation files of one of the authors (B.W.S.). CONCLUSIONS: The identification of tumor mimics may be difficult under the best of circumstances, and maintaining a broad differential diagnosis as well as application of a variety of immunocytochemical and occasionally ultrastructural and/or molecular genetic methods is essential to arrive at a correct diagnosis.
Authors: Arthur J M Lopes; Roger S Brock; Thiago G Martins; Raphael S S de Medeiro; Daniel Montezzo; Matheus F de Oliveira; Manoel J Teixeira Journal: Surg Neurol Int Date: 2016-12-26