Literature DB >> 20196623

Cost effectiveness of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors for the prevention of prostate cancer in multiple patient populations.

Stephanie R Earnshaw1, Cheryl L McDade, Libby K Black, Christopher F Bell, Michael W Kattan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) have demonstrated that they reduce the risk of prostate cancer (PCa), they have not demonstrated cost effectiveness in the patient populations in which they have been examined.
OBJECTIVE: A decision-analytic model was created to explore economic benefits from a third-party payer perspective of the use of 5ARIs in preventing PCa in men with different risk factors for developing the disease.
METHODS: A Markov model was developed to simulate a cohort of men annually through health states (e.g. healthy male, benign prostatic hyperplasia [BPH], PCa, PCa recurrence) over a man's lifetime. Men with risk factors were treated with a 5ARI and compared with patients given no chemoprevention. Men from the general population were examined along with higher-risk men who had been referred to a PCa centre. Baseline risk was estimated via published risk data, risk factor analyses and risk equations. Clinical efficacy, morality, costs and utilities were obtained from published literature. Outcomes of the model included number of prostate cancers, incremental costs, incremental QALYs, incremental cost per QALY and number needed to treat. Along with sensitivity and scenario analyses, a validation of outcomes was performed. All costs were valued in $US, year 2009 values. Costs were discounted at 3% per annum.
RESULTS: Men receiving 5ARIs benefited through a reduction in the number of PCas. Assuming a cost-effectiveness threshold of $US50 000 per QALY, chemoprevention with 5ARIs was cost effective ($US37 900 per QALY) in men from the general population who were aged 50 years with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and who were aged 50 years with PCa family history and elevated PSA ($US31 065 per QALY). Chemoprevention with 5ARIs was not cost effective in men aged 50 years with no additional risk factors, men aged 50 years with abnormal digital rectal examinations (DREs), and men aged 50 years with a family history ($US86 511, $US85 577 and $US84 950 per QALY, respectively). In higher-risk men, chemoprevention could be expected to be cost effective ($US18 490 to $US11 816 per QALY, depending on risk scenario). Results were sensitive to changes in utilities, assumed PCa risk reduction with 5ARIs, and patient age.
CONCLUSION: When considering common risk factors associated with PCa, prevention with 5ARIs is expected to be cost effective in 50-year-old men with elevated PSA. As a man's risk increases, the cost effectiveness of 5ARI chemoprevention improves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20196623     DOI: 10.2165/11531780-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  37 in total

Review 1.  The story of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  F H Schröder; L J Denis; M Roobol; V Nelen; A Auvinen; T Tammela; A Villers; X Rebillard; S Ciatto; M Zappa; A Berenguer; A Paez; J Hugosson; P Lodding; F Recker; M Kwiatkowski; W J Kirkels
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  The cost of prostate cancer chemoprevention: a decision analysis model.

Authors:  Robert S Svatek; J Jack Lee; Claus G Roehrborn; Scott M Lippman; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Utility scores for chronic conditions in a community-dwelling population.

Authors:  N Mittmann; K Trakas; N Risebrough; B A Liu
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Economic analysis of finasteride: a model-based approach using data from the Proscar Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Study.

Authors:  P C Albertsen; J M Pellissier; F C Lowe; C J Girman; C G Roehrborn
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.393

5.  The effect of finasteride on the risk of acute urinary retention and the need for surgical treatment among men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Finasteride Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Study Group.

Authors:  J D McConnell; R Bruskewitz; P Walsh; G Andriole; M Lieber; H L Holtgrewe; P Albertsen; C G Roehrborn; J C Nickel; D Z Wang; A M Taylor; J Waldstreicher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-02-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Prevention of hormone-related cancers: prostate cancer.

Authors:  Howard L Parnes; Ian M Thompson; Leslie G Ford
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Efficacy and safety of dutasteride in the four-year treatment of men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Claus G Roehrborn; Leonard S Marks; Tom Fenter; Sheldon Freedman; John Tuttle; Marc Gittleman; Betsy Morrill; Eric T Wolford
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Cost comparison of radical retropubic and radical perineal prostatectomy: single institution experience.

Authors:  Ari D Silverstein; Alon Z Weizer; Jeannette M Dowell; Brian K Auge; David F Paulson; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Chemoprevention of prostate cancer in men at high risk: rationale and design of the reduction by dutasteride of prostate cancer events (REDUCE) trial.

Authors:  Gerald Andriole; David Bostwick; Otis Brawley; Leonard Gomella; Michael Marberger; Donald Tindall; Sharon Breed; Matt Somerville; Roger Rittmaster
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  A comparison of the cost of various treatment methods for early cancer of the prostate.

Authors:  G E Hanks; K Dunlap
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  3 in total

1.  Does variation in either age at start of therapy or duration of therapy make chemoprevention with finasteride cost-effective?

Authors:  S B Stewart; C D Scales; J W Moul; S D Reed
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 2.  Model-based cost-effectiveness analyses for prostate cancer chemoprevention : a review and summary of challenges.

Authors:  Stephanie R Earnshaw; Andrew P Brogan; Cheryl L McDade
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  5-α reductase inhibitors and prostate cancer prevention: where do we turn now?

Authors:  Robert J Hamilton; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 8.775

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.