Literature DB >> 20196067

Effect of the correction for noncompliance and contamination on the estimated reduction of metastatic prostate cancer within a randomized screening trial (ERSPC section Rotterdam).

Melissa Kerkhof1, Monique J Roobol, Jack Cuzick, Peter Sasieni, Stijn Roemeling, Fritz H Schröder, Ewout W Steyerberg.   

Abstract

The European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) has recently reported a 20% reduction in death from prostate cancer in a population-based prostate cancer screening (core age group: 55-69 years of age). The effect of screening may be diluted by noncompliance in the screening arm and contamination by PSA testing in the control arm. The purpose is to analyze the effect of prostate cancer screening on the incidence of metastatic prostate cancer, both with and without adjustment for noncompliance and contamination. We analyzed the occurrence of metastases in 42,376 men aged 55-75 years who were randomized in the Rotterdam section of the ERSPC between 1993 and 1999. Contamination adjustment was based on follow-up findings and questionnaire data from all men in the control group who developed prostate cancer and from a random sample of 291 men without cancer who had a PSA test. Prostate cancer screening significantly reduced the occurrence of metastatic prostate cancer in the intention-to-screen analysis [RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59-0.95, p = 0.02] and more so in adjusted analyses; contamination adjusted RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56-0.96; noncompliance adjusted RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.95 and fully adjusted analysis RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.94, p = 0.02. In the population of ERSPC Rotterdam (N = 42,376 men), screening reduces the risk to be diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer considerably on population level, an effect which is even more pronounced in men who are in fact screened.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20196067     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  7 in total

1.  What we have learned from randomized trials of prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; Anthony Y Smith
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  PSA screening for prostate cancer: why so much controversy?

Authors:  Fernand Labrie
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  A System Dynamics Model of Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Anton Palma; David W Lounsbury; Nicolas F Schlecht; Ilir Agalliu
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Single positive core prostate cancer in a 12-core transrectal biopsy scheme: clinicopathological implications compared with multifocal counterpart.

Authors:  Hong Jae Ahn; Young Hwii Ko; Hoon Ah Jang; Sung Gu Kang; Seok Ho Kang; Hong Seok Park; Jeong Gu Lee; Je Jong Kim; Jun Cheon
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-10-21

5.  Prostate-specific antigen testing in Tyrol, Austria: prostate cancer mortality reduction was supported by an update with mortality data up to 2008.

Authors:  Willi Oberaigner; Uwe Siebert; Wolfgang Horninger; Helmut Klocker; Jasmin Bektic; Georg Schäfer; Ferdinand Frauscher; Harald Schennach; Georg Bartsch
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.380

6.  Real-world data in elderly men from Yokosuka City 15 years after introducing prostate-specific antigen-based population screening.

Authors:  Takuma Nirei; Tadashi Tabei; Naoki Sakai; Hideshige Koh; Minoru Yoshida; Atsushi Fujikawa; Hiroki Ito; Sohgo Tsutsumi; Souichi Furuhata; Sumio Noguchi; Masataka Taguri; Kazuki Kobayashi
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-12-20

Review 7.  Personalized strategies in population screening for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Remmers; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 7.396

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.