Literature DB >> 20195954

Maternal body mass index does not affect performance of fetal electrocardiography.

E Margo Graatsma1, Jena Miller, Eduard J H Mulder, Christopher Harman, Ahmet A Baschat, Gerard H A Visser.   

Abstract

The obesity epidemic challenges traditional antenatal fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring technologies. Doppler signals in particular are attenuated. We sought to evaluate whether the performance of a novel transabdominal fetal electrocardiogram (fECG) device (AN24, Monica Healthcare) is influenced by body mass index (BMI). We performed a prospective observational study of singleton pregnancies (gestational age [GA] 20 to 41 weeks) monitored overnight with fECG. Recording quality ([RQ] %) of both the best hour and the total recording time of the FHR record were related to BMI. Two hundred four women were monitored. BMI ranged from 16.0 to 50.7 (median BMI 26.9). The correlation coefficient (with 95% confidence interval [CI]) between BMI and RQ was -0.35 (CI -0.60; -0.03) for the gestational age group 20(+0) to 25(+6) weeks, -0.08 (CI -0.28; 0.13) for GA 26(+0) to 33(+6) weeks, and -0.20 (CI -0.40; 0.03) for GA group > or =34(+0) weeks. Median RQ in obese women (BMI > or =30 kg/m(2)) was 97.4, 98.9, and 100%, respectively. BMI has no clinically significant influence on recording quality of FHR monitored with fECG. It can therefore be considered a good method for monitoring the fetal condition in pregnancies of obese women. Copyright Thieme Medical Publishers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20195954     DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1248945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  6 in total

1.  Electrocardiographic intervals in foetuses with CHD.

Authors:  Betul Yilmaz; Hari K Narayan; Abigail Wilpers; Christina Wiess; William P Fifer; Ismée A Williams
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 1.093

2.  A systematic scoping review to identify the design and assess the performance of devices for antenatal continuous fetal monitoring.

Authors:  Kajal K Tamber; Dexter J L Hayes; Stephen J Carey; Jayawan H B Wijekoon; Alexander E P Heazell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Monitoring Fetal Heart Rate during Labor: A Comparison of Three Methods.

Authors:  Tammy Y Euliano; Shalom Darmanjian; Minh Tam Nguyen; John D Busowski; Neil Euliano; Anthony R Gregg
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2017-03-14

4.  Assessment of Cardiac Rate and Rhythm in Fetuses with Arrhythmia via Maternal Abdominal Fetal Electrocardiography.

Authors:  Hari K Narayan; Emilia F Vignola; William P Fifer; Ismee A Williams
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2015-09-09

5.  Standard External Doppler Fetal Heart Tracings versus External Fetal Electrocardiogram in Very Preterm Gestation: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Gary Fruhman; Jeffrey A Gavard; Kristina McCormick; Judy Wilson-Griffin; Erol Amon; Gilad A Gross
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2016-10

6.  Evaluation of an external fetal electrocardiogram monitoring system: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Martha Monson; Cara Heuser; Brett D Einerson; Isaac Esplin; Greg Snow; Michael Varner; M Sean Esplin
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 8.661

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.