Literature DB >> 20195912

Self-tolerance and autoimmunity in a regulatory T cell model.

H K Alexander1, L M Wahl.   

Abstract

The class of immunosuppressive lymphocytes known as regulatory T cells (Tregs) has been identified as a key component in preventing autoimmune diseases. Although Tregs have been incorporated previously in mathematical models of autoimmunity, we take a novel approach which emphasizes the importance of professional antigen presenting cells (pAPCs). We examine three possible mechanisms of Treg action (each in isolation) through ordinary differential equation (ODE) models. The immune response against a particular autoantigen is suppressed both by Tregs specific for that antigen and by Tregs of arbitrary specificities, through their action on either maturing or already mature pAPCs or on autoreactive effector T cells. In this deterministic approach, we find that qualitative long-term behaviour is predicted by the basic reproductive ratio R(0) for each system. When R(0)<1, only the trivial equilibrium exists and is stable; when R(0)>1, this equilibrium loses its stability and a stable non-trivial equilibrium appears. We interpret the absence of self-damaging populations at the trivial equilibrium to imply a state of self-tolerance, and their presence at the non-trivial equilibrium to imply a state of chronic autoimmunity. Irrespective of mechanism, our model predicts that Tregs specific for the autoantigen in question play no role in the system's qualitative long-term behaviour, but have quantitative effects that could potentially reduce an autoimmune response to sub-clinical levels. Our results also suggest an important role for Tregs of arbitrary specificities in modulating the qualitative outcome. A stochastic treatment of the same model demonstrates that the probability of developing a chronic autoimmune response increases with the initial exposure to self antigen or autoreactive effector T cells. The three different mechanisms we consider, while leading to a number of similar predictions, also exhibit key differences in both transient dynamics (ODE approach) and the probability of chronic autoimmunity (stochastic approach).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20195912     DOI: 10.1007/s11538-010-9519-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Math Biol        ISSN: 0092-8240            Impact factor:   1.758


  9 in total

1.  Backward bifurcations, turning points and rich dynamics in simple disease models.

Authors:  Wenjing Zhang; Lindi M Wahl; Pei Yu
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Modelling and Simulation of the Dynamics of the Antigen-Specific T Cell Response Using Variable Structure Control Theory.

Authors:  Anet J N Anelone; Sarah K Spurgeon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Quantifying the Role of Stochasticity in the Development of Autoimmune Disease.

Authors:  Lindsay B Nicholson; Konstantin B Blyuss; Farzad Fatehi
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Modeling the Potential of Treg-Based Therapies for Transplant Rejection: Effect of Dose, Timing, and Accumulation Site.

Authors:  Maya M Lapp; Guang Lin; Alexander Komin; Leah Andrews; Mei Knudson; Lauren Mossman; Giorgio Raimondi; Julia C Arciero
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.842

5.  Immune Tolerance Maintained by Cooperative Interactions between T Cells and Antigen Presenting Cells Shapes a Diverse TCR Repertoire.

Authors:  Katharine Best; Benny Chain; Chris Watkins
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 6.  Mechanisms Underlying CD4+ Treg Immune Regulation in the Adult: From Experiments to Models.

Authors:  Marta Caridade; Luis Graca; Ruy M Ribeiro
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  Predictive models of type 1 diabetes progression: understanding T-cell cycles and their implications on autoantibody release.

Authors:  Majid Jaberi-Douraki; Massimo Pietropaolo; Anmar Khadra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Stochastic Effects in Autoimmune Dynamics.

Authors:  Farzad Fatehi; Sergey N Kyrychko; Aleksandra Ross; Yuliya N Kyrychko; Konstantin B Blyuss
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 9.  Quantitative Predictive Modelling Approaches to Understanding Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Brief Review.

Authors:  Fiona R Macfarlane; Mark A J Chaplain; Raluca Eftimie
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 6.600

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.