Literature DB >> 20195208

The effect of posterior distraction on vertebral growth in immature pigs: an experimental simulation of growing rod technique.

Güney Yilmaz1, Gazi Huri, Gökhan Demirkran, Kenan Dağloğlu, Cenk Ozkan, Ahmet Alanay, Emre Acaroglu, Muharrem Yazici.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Experimental study.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the vertebral body growth under distraction forces in immature pigs treated with growing rod (GR) technique. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Distraction forces applied on growth plate of appendicular skeleton stimulate longitudinal growth. However, the effect of distraction forces on axial skeletal growth has not been fully investigated yet.
METHODS: Twelve 10-week-old domestic pigs were used in this experimental model to simulate GR technique. Four of them were lost during postoperative period because of deep wound infection. Cranially T12-L1 and caudally L4-L5 vertebrae were instrumented by pedicle screws bilaterally, while L2 and L3 were skipped. Distraction between pedicle screws was applied at index surgery. The rods were then lengthened twice in a month interval. All subjects were evaluated with anteroposterior and lateral spinal radiograph before surgery, after surgery, and at the final follow-up. The vertebral body heights of distracted segments (HD = L2 and L3) and control segments (HC = T9, T10 and T11) were measured. Average vertebral body heights and the increase percentage in the vertebral body heights were compared among control segments and distracted segments.
RESULTS: The preoperative vertebral body height was similar in 2 groups (preHC: 10.81 mm, n = 19, preHD: 11.27 mm, n = 16, P > 0.05). At the final follow-up, the average vertebral body height in distraction group was significantly higher than the control group (postHC: 17.03 mm, postHD: 18.58 mm, P < 0.05). The increase percentage in vertebral body height was higher in distracted segments, but there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSION: The vertebral growth continues during GR instrumentation. Distraction forces might stimulate also apophyseal growth of axial skeleton.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20195208     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bcc3a3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

1.  Fusionless procedures for the management of early-onset spine deformities in 2011: what do we know?

Authors:  Behrooz A Akbarnia; Robert M Campbell; Alain Dimeglio; Jack M Flynn; Gregory J Redding; Paul D Sponseller; Michael G Vitale; Muharrem Yazici
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 2.  Growing rod concepts: state of the art.

Authors:  Muharrem Yazici; Z Deniz Olgun
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Current benchtop protocols are not appropriate for the evaluation of distraction-based growing rods: a literature review to justify a new protocol and its development.

Authors:  Niloufar Shekouhi; Amey Kelkar; David Dick; Vijay K Goel; Derek Shaw
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Characteristic Reconstitution of the Spinal Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis in Young Children.

Authors:  Naoyuki Nakamura; Yutaka Inaba; Yoichi Aota; Jiro Machida; Tomoyuki Saito
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.324

5.  Flexible growing rods: a biomechanical pilot study of polymer rod constructs in the stability of skeletally immature spines.

Authors:  Donita I Bylski-Austrow; David L Glos; Anne C Bonifas; Max F Carvalho; Matthew C Coombs; Peter F Sturm
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2016-09-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.