Literature DB >> 20195201

Critical length of fusion requiring additional fixation to prevent nonunion of the lumbosacral junction.

Chong-Suh Lee1, Sung Soo Chung, Sung Woo Choi, Jae Wook Yu, Min Su Sohn.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the critical length of fusion that warrants additional stronger fixation in lumbosacral (L-S) fusion, and to analyze the risk factors of nonunion at the L-S junction. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Long lever arm fusion down to S1 requires stronger fixation than short lever arm fusion. However, no published criteria are available about the critical length of fusion requiring stronger fixation to the ilium or S2 to obtain adequate stability for union at the L-S junction.
METHODS: A total of 327 adult patients with degenerative lumbar disease, who were treated with instrumented fusion, including the L-S junction, were included in this study. Mean patient age was 59.7 (20-79) years and the minimum follow-up was 12 months. Union rates were compared using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Length of fusion, age, sex, lumbar lordosis at preoperative, early postoperative and final follow-ups, BMD, smoking history, associated morbidities, fat content of paraspinal muscle, methods of fusion, and levels of intercristal line were examined as independent variables to identify factors that affect union rate at the L-S junction.
RESULTS: Of the 327 patients, 47 (14.4%) had nonunion at the L-S junction. Union rate of the L-S junction at the single level, and at 2, 3, 4, 5, and more than 5 levels were 96.6%, 92.9%, 87.4%, 64.7%, 66.7%, and 58.0%, respectively. A significant difference of union rate was found between less than 4 levels and 4 or more levels of fusion (P < 0.05). The factors found by multivariate analysis to significantly affect union rate at the L-S junction were fusion length and fat content of paraspinal muscle.
CONCLUSION: The risk of nonunion at the L-S junction was found to increase significantly for more than 3 levels of fusion. We advise that additional stronger fixation is needed in such cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20195201     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bfa518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

1.  Range of motion, sacral screw and rod strain in long posterior spinal constructs: a biomechanical comparison between S2 alar iliac screws with traditional fixation strategies.

Authors:  Chester E Sutterlin; Antony Field; Lisa A Ferrara; Andrew L Freeman; Kevin Phan
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-12

2.  Biomechanics of sacropelvic fixation: a comprehensive finite element comparison of three techniques.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Gloria Casaroli; Ruchi Chande; Derek Lindsey; Tomaso Villa; Scott Yerby; Ali Mesiwala; Matteo Panico; Enrico Gallazzi; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Can fat infiltration in the multifidus muscle be a predictor of postoperative symptoms and complications in patients undergoing lumbar fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis? A case-control study.

Authors:  Gengyu Han; Da Zou; Xinhang Li; Shuquan Zhang; Zhenxu Li; Siyu Zhou; Wei Li; Zhuoran Sun; Weishi Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 2.677

4.  Survival rates and risk factors for cephalad and L5-s1 adjacent segment degeneration after L5 floating lumbar fusion : a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Young-Seok Lee; Young-Baeg Kim; Seung-Won Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-02-26

5.  Posterolateral lumbar fusion: Relationship between computed tomography Hounsfield units and symptomatic pseudoarthrosis.

Authors:  Ha Son Nguyen; Saman Shabani; Mohit Patel; Dennis Maiman
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-11-25

6.  Mini-Open Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Corrective Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity.

Authors:  Chong-Suh Lee; Se-Jun Park; Sung-Soo Chung; Jun-Young Lee; Tae-Hoon Yum; Seong-Kee Shin
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-12-08

7.  Risk Factor Analysis for Fat Infiltration in the Lumbar Paraspinal Muscles in Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Diseases.

Authors:  Kenta Suzuki; Yuki Hasebe; Mitsuru Yamamoto; Kazuo Saita; Satoshi Ogihara
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-13

8.  Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion with stand-alone cages in patients with multilevel degenerative cervical spine disease is safe.

Authors:  Mohamed H Tohamy; Georg Osterhoff; Ahmed Shawky Abdelgawaad; Ali Ezzati; Christoph-E Heyde
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  The Effects of Spinopelvic Parameters and Paraspinal Muscle Degeneration on S1 Screw Loosening.

Authors:  Jin-Bum Kim; Seung-Won Park; Young-Seok Lee; Taek-Kyun Nam; Yong-Sook Park; Young-Baeg Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-10-30

10.  The fatty degeneration of the lumbar erector spinae muscles affects dynamic spinal compensation ability during gait in adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Kousei Miura; Hideki Kadone; Tomoyuki Asada; Masao Koda; Toru Funayama; Hiroshi Takahashi; Hiroshi Noguchi; Kentaro Mataki; Yosuke Shibao; Kosuke Sato; Fumihiko Eto; Mamoru Kono; Kenji Suzuki; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.