Literature DB >> 20195170

Who are less likely to receive subsequent chemotherapy beyond first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer? Implications for selection of patients for maintenance therapy.

Jong-Mu Sun1, Joon Oh Park, Young-Woong Won, Jung-Hoon Kim, Jina Yun, Jeeyun Lee, Yeon Hee Park, Jin Seok Ahn, Myung-Ju Ahn, Keunchil Park.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prospective studies have implied that maintenance therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has its effect by giving active drugs earlier to patients who otherwise die without receiving second-line therapy. The purpose of this study was to select patients with NSCLC who could most benefit from maintenance therapy, by evaluating which patients would be less likely to receive second-line therapy.
METHODS: Clinicopathologic data of patients with advanced NSCLC who received four cycles of first-line chemotherapy followed by time-off therapy and eventual disease progression or death were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were grouped into ones with first-line therapy only or ones with more than first-line therapy. Clinical characteristics between the two groups were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 271 patients were eligible for analysis, and 39 patients (14.4%) received only first-line therapy. Patients significantly more likely to receive only first-line therapy had performance status of two or three after first-line therapy, large volume of initial target lesions (sum of long diameters >or=70 mm), or smaller decrease in target lesions (decrease <20%) after first-line therapy. Median overall survival of the 143 patients (52.8%) with at least one of these characteristics (16.3 months) was significantly shorter than that of patients without any of these characteristics (23.5 months, p = 0.007).
CONCLUSION: Maintenance therapy may be of greater benefit to patients with NSCLC who have clinical characteristics including poor performance status after first-line therapy, large initial target lesions, or smaller decrease in target lesions after first-line therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20195170     DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181d3504d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  8 in total

1.  Predictors and impact of second-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the United States: real-world considerations for maintenance therapy.

Authors:  David E Gerber; Drew W Rasco; Phat Le; Jingsheng Yan; Jonathan E Dowell; Yang Xie
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 2.  Maintenance chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: new life for an old idea.

Authors:  David E Gerber; Joan H Schiller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  A phase II study of carboplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab followed by erlotinib and bevacizumab maintenance for non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with wild-type EGFR (HOT1101).

Authors:  Taichi Takashina; Hajime Asahina; Satoshi Oizumi; Noriyuki Yamada; Masao Harada; Kei Takamura; Hiroshi Yokouchi; Toshiyuki Harada; Osamu Honjo; Takahiro Ogi; Naoto Morikawa; Ichiro Kinoshita; Ryoichi Honda; Kosuke Nakano; Kenya Kanazawa; Toraji Amano; Hirotoshi Dosaka-Akita; Hiroshi Isobe; Masaharu Nishimura
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Patient comprehension and attitudes toward maintenance chemotherapy for lung cancer.

Authors:  David E Gerber; Heidi A Hamann; Drew W Rasco; Sharon Woodruff; Simon J Craddock Lee
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-05-24

5.  Maintenance Therapy for NSCLC: Consensus and Controversy.

Authors:  Shun Lu; Yong-Feng Yu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  The effectiveness of maintenance pharmacotherapies for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Myung-Ju Ahn; Jong-Mu Sun; Jin Sock Ahn; Keunchil Park
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2012-06-11

7.  PARAMOUNT: Descriptive subgroup analyses of final overall survival for the phase III study of maintenance pemetrexed versus placebo following induction treatment with pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Martin Reck; Luis G Paz-Ares; Filippo de Marinis; Olivier Molinier; Tarini Prasad Sahoo; Eckart Laack; William John; Annamaria H Zimmermann; Carla Visseren-Grul; Cesare Gridelli
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 15.609

8.  Systemic therapy treatment patterns in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): PIvOTAL study.

Authors:  J de Castro; P Tagliaferri; V C C de Lima; S Ng; M Thomas; A Arunachalam; X Cao; S Kothari; T Burke; H Myeong; A Grattan; D H Lee
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 2.520

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.