PURPOSE: To evaluate the degree of psychological distress in adult childhood cancer survivors in Switzerland and to characterize survivors with significant distress. METHODS: Childhood cancer survivors who were age younger than 16 years when diagnosed between 1976 and 2003, had survived more than 5 years, and were currently age 20 years or older received a postal questionnaire. Psychological distress was assessed using the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). Raw scores were transformed into T scores according to the German norm sample, and the proportion of participants being at increased risk for psychological distress was calculated (case rule: T > or = 63). t tests and univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: One thousand seventy-six survivors (63.% of eligible survivors, 71.9% of contacted survivors) returned the questionnaire, 987 with complete data on BSI. Comparison with the norm populations showed lower T scores (T < 50) in the Global Severity Index (GSI; T = 46.2), somatization (T = 47.6), obsessive-compulsive tendencies (T = 46.9), and anxiety (T = 48.4). However, more childhood cancer survivors (especially women) had increased distress for GSI (14.4%), interpersonal sensitivity (16.5%), depression (13.4%), aggression (16.9%), and psychotic tendencies (15.6%) than the expected 10% from the norm population. Caseness was associated with female sex, being a single child, older age at study, and self-reported late effects, especially psychological problems. CONCLUSION: Results show that childhood cancer survivors, on average, have less psychological distress than a norm population but that the proportion of survivors at risk for high psychological distress is disproportionally large. Monitoring psychological distress in childhood cancer survivors may be desirable during routine follow-up, and psychological support should be offered as needed.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the degree of psychological distress in adult childhood cancer survivors in Switzerland and to characterize survivors with significant distress. METHODS: Childhood cancer survivors who were age younger than 16 years when diagnosed between 1976 and 2003, had survived more than 5 years, and were currently age 20 years or older received a postal questionnaire. Psychological distress was assessed using the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). Raw scores were transformed into T scores according to the German norm sample, and the proportion of participants being at increased risk for psychological distress was calculated (case rule: T > or = 63). t tests and univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: One thousand seventy-six survivors (63.% of eligible survivors, 71.9% of contacted survivors) returned the questionnaire, 987 with complete data on BSI. Comparison with the norm populations showed lower T scores (T < 50) in the Global Severity Index (GSI; T = 46.2), somatization (T = 47.6), obsessive-compulsive tendencies (T = 46.9), and anxiety (T = 48.4). However, more childhood cancer survivors (especially women) had increased distress for GSI (14.4%), interpersonal sensitivity (16.5%), depression (13.4%), aggression (16.9%), and psychotic tendencies (15.6%) than the expected 10% from the norm population. Caseness was associated with female sex, being a single child, older age at study, and self-reported late effects, especially psychological problems. CONCLUSION: Results show that childhood cancer survivors, on average, have less psychological distress than a norm population but that the proportion of survivors at risk for high psychological distress is disproportionally large. Monitoring psychological distress in childhood cancer survivors may be desirable during routine follow-up, and psychological support should be offered as needed.
Authors: Micòl E Gianinazzi; Corina S Rueegg; Janine Vetsch; Sonja Lüer; Claudia E Kuehni; Gisela Michel Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-05-24 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Qian Lu; Kevin R Krull; Wendy Leisenring; Jason E Owen; Toana Kawashima; Jennie C I Tsao; Bradley Zebrack; Ann Mertens; Gregory T Armstrong; Marilyn Stovall; Leslie L Robison; Lonnie K Zeltzer Journal: Pain Date: 2011-09-09 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: S Cristina Oancea; Tara M Brinkman; Kirsten K Ness; Kevin R Krull; Webb A Smith; D Kumar Srivastava; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; James G Gurney Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Stephanie B Dixon; Nan Li; Yutaka Yasui; Smita Bhatia; Jacqueline N Casillas; Todd M Gibson; Kirsten K Ness; Jerlym S Porter; Rebecca M Howell; Wendy M Leisenring; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Kevin R Krull; Gregory T Armstrong Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-07-10 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Tara M Brinkman; Christopher J Recklitis; Gisela Michel; Martha A Grootenhuis; James L Klosky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David R Strauser; Fong Chan; Elizabeth Fine; Kanako Iwanaga; Chelsea Greco; Cori Liptak Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2018-10-24 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Inga M Jóhannsdóttir; Torbjørn Moum; Marianne J Hjermstad; Finn Wesenberg; Lars Hjorth; Henrik Schrøder; Päivi M Lähteenmäki; Gudmundur Jónmundsson; Jon H Loge Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 2.223