BACKGROUND:Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for major depression. Optimising efficacy and minimising cognitive impairment are goals of ongoing technical refinements. AIMS: To compare the efficacy and cognitive effects of a novel electrode placement, bifrontal, with two standard electrode placements, bitemporal and right unilateral in ECT. METHOD: This multicentre randomised, double-blind, controlled trial (NCT00069407) was carried out from 2001 to 2006. A total of 230 individuals with major depression, bipolar and unipolar, were randomly assigned to one of three electrode placements during a course of ECT: bifrontal at one and a half times seizure threshold, bitemporal at one and a half times seizure threshold and right unilateral at six times seizure threshold. RESULTS: All three electrode placements resulted in both clinically and statistically significant antidepressant outcomes. Remission rates were 55% (95% CI 43-66%) with right unilateral, 61% with bifrontal (95% CI 50-71%) and 64% (95% CI 53-75%) with bitemporal. Bitemporal resulted in a more rapid decline in symptom ratings over the early course of treatment. Cognitive data revealed few differences between the electrode placements on a variety of neuropsychological instruments. CONCLUSIONS: Each electrode placement is a very effective antidepressant treatment when given with appropriate electrical dosing. Bitemporal leads to more rapid symptom reduction and should be considered the preferred placement for urgent clinical situations. The cognitive profile of bifrontal is not substantially different from that of bitemporal.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for major depression. Optimising efficacy and minimising cognitive impairment are goals of ongoing technical refinements. AIMS: To compare the efficacy and cognitive effects of a novel electrode placement, bifrontal, with two standard electrode placements, bitemporal and right unilateral in ECT. METHOD: This multicentre randomised, double-blind, controlled trial (NCT00069407) was carried out from 2001 to 2006. A total of 230 individuals with major depression, bipolar and unipolar, were randomly assigned to one of three electrode placements during a course of ECT: bifrontal at one and a half times seizure threshold, bitemporal at one and a half times seizure threshold and right unilateral at six times seizure threshold. RESULTS: All three electrode placements resulted in both clinically and statistically significant antidepressant outcomes. Remission rates were 55% (95% CI 43-66%) with right unilateral, 61% with bifrontal (95% CI 50-71%) and 64% (95% CI 53-75%) with bitemporal. Bitemporal resulted in a more rapid decline in symptom ratings over the early course of treatment. Cognitive data revealed few differences between the electrode placements on a variety of neuropsychological instruments. CONCLUSIONS: Each electrode placement is a very effective antidepressant treatment when given with appropriate electrical dosing. Bitemporal leads to more rapid symptom reduction and should be considered the preferred placement for urgent clinical situations. The cognitive profile of bifrontal is not substantially different from that of bitemporal.
Authors: H A Sackeim; J Prudic; D P Devanand; M S Nobler; S H Lisanby; S Peyser; L Fitzsimons; B J Moody; J Clark Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2000-05
Authors: G Petrides; M Fink; M M Husain; R G Knapp; A J Rush; M Mueller; T A Rummans; K M O'Connor; K G Rasmussen; H J Bernstein; M Biggs; S H Bailine; C H Kellner Journal: J ECT Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 3.635
Authors: Nir Lipsman; Tejas Sankar; Jonathan Downar; Sidney H Kennedy; Andres M Lozano; Peter Giacobbe Journal: CMAJ Date: 2013-07-29 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Megha M Vasavada; Amber M Leaver; Stephanie Njau; Shantanu H Joshi; Linda Ercoli; Gerhard Hellemann; Katherine L Narr; Randall Espinoza Journal: J ECT Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 3.635
Authors: Gregory L Sahlem; William V McCall; E Baron Short; Peter B Rosenquist; James B Fox; Nagy A Youssef; Andrew J Manett; Suzanne E Kerns; Morgan M Dancy; Laryssa McCloud; Mark S George; Harold A Sackeim Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Charles H Kellner; Emma T Geduldig; Rebecca G Knapp; Robert C Young; Richard D Weiner; Robert M Greenberg; Joan Prudic; W Vaughn McCall; Georgios Petrides; Mustafa M Husain; Matthew V Rudorfer; Sarah H Lisanby Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 9.319