OBJECTIVE: Recognition memory of faces is impaired in patients with schizophrenia, as is the neural processing of threat-related signals, but how these deficits interact to produce symptoms is unclear. The authors used an affective face recognition paradigm to examine possible interactions between cognitive and affective neural systems in schizophrenia. METHOD: Blood-oxygen-level-dependent response was examined by means of functional magnetic resonance imaging (3 Tesla) in healthy comparison subjects (N=21) and in patients with schizophrenia (N=12) or schizoaffective disorder, depressed type (N=4), during a two-choice recognition task that used images of human faces. Each target face, previously displayed with a threatening or nonthreatening affect, was displayed with neutral affect. Responses to successful recognition and responses to the effect of previously threatening versus nonthreatening affect were evaluated, and correlations with symptom severity (total Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale score) were examined. Functional connectivity analyses examined the relationship between activation in the amygdala and cortical regions involved in recognition memory. RESULTS: Patients performed the task more slowly than healthy comparison subjects. Comparison subjects recruited the expected cortical regions to a greater degree than patients, and patients with more severe symptoms demonstrated proportionally less recruitment. Increased symptoms were also correlated with augmented amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex response to threatening faces. Comparison subjects exhibited a negative correlation between activity in the amygdala and cortical regions involved in cognition, while patients showed weakening of this relationship. CONCLUSION: Increased symptoms were related to an enhanced threat response in limbic regions and a diminished recognition memory response in cortical regions, supporting a link between these two brain systems that are often examined in isolation. This finding suggests that abnormal processing of threat-related signals in the environment may exacerbate cognitive impairment in schizophrenia.
OBJECTIVE: Recognition memory of faces is impaired in patients with schizophrenia, as is the neural processing of threat-related signals, but how these deficits interact to produce symptoms is unclear. The authors used an affective face recognition paradigm to examine possible interactions between cognitive and affective neural systems in schizophrenia. METHOD: Blood-oxygen-level-dependent response was examined by means of functional magnetic resonance imaging (3 Tesla) in healthy comparison subjects (N=21) and in patients with schizophrenia (N=12) or schizoaffective disorder, depressed type (N=4), during a two-choice recognition task that used images of human faces. Each target face, previously displayed with a threatening or nonthreatening affect, was displayed with neutral affect. Responses to successful recognition and responses to the effect of previously threatening versus nonthreatening affect were evaluated, and correlations with symptom severity (total Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale score) were examined. Functional connectivity analyses examined the relationship between activation in the amygdala and cortical regions involved in recognition memory. RESULTS:Patients performed the task more slowly than healthy comparison subjects. Comparison subjects recruited the expected cortical regions to a greater degree than patients, and patients with more severe symptoms demonstrated proportionally less recruitment. Increased symptoms were also correlated with augmented amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex response to threatening faces. Comparison subjects exhibited a negative correlation between activity in the amygdala and cortical regions involved in cognition, while patients showed weakening of this relationship. CONCLUSION: Increased symptoms were related to an enhanced threat response in limbic regions and a diminished recognition memory response in cortical regions, supporting a link between these two brain systems that are often examined in isolation. This finding suggests that abnormal processing of threat-related signals in the environment may exacerbate cognitive impairment in schizophrenia.
Authors: Justin L Vincent; Abraham Z Snyder; Michael D Fox; Benjamin J Shannon; Jessica R Andrews; Marcus E Raichle; Randy L Buckner Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2006-08-09 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Theodore D Satterthwaite; Daniel H Wolf; Ruben C Gur; Kosha Ruparel; Jeffrey N Valdez; Raquel E Gur; James Loughead Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Frank Schneider; Ruben C Gur; Kathrin Koch; Volker Backes; Katrin Amunts; N Jon Shah; Warren Bilker; Raquel E Gur; Ute Habel Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Daniel H Wolf; Ruben C Gur; Jeffrey N Valdez; James Loughead; Mark A Elliott; Raquel E Gur; J Daniel Ragland Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2007-03-13 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Michael P Ewbank; Andrew D Lawrence; Luca Passamonti; Jill Keane; Polly V Peers; Andrew J Calder Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-10-19 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Birgit Derntl; Andreas Finkelmeyer; Bianca Voss; Simon B Eickhoff; Thilo Kellermann; Frank Schneider; Ute Habel Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2012-02-04 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Martin Rozycki; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Nikolaos Koutsouleris; Guray Erus; Jimit Doshi; Daniel H Wolf; Yong Fan; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur; Eva M Meisenzahl; Chuanjun Zhuo; Hong Yin; Hao Yan; Weihua Yue; Dai Zhang; Christos Davatzikos Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2018-08-20 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Daniel H Wolf; Theodore D Satterthwaite; James Loughead; Amy Pinkham; Eve Overton; Mark A Elliott; Gersham W Dent; Mark A Smith; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2011-05-21 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Theodore D Satterthwaite; Daniel H Wolf; Amy E Pinkham; Kosha Ruparel; Mark A Elliott; Jeffrey N Valdez; Eve Overton; Janina Seubert; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur; James Loughead Journal: Brain Cogn Date: 2011-05-19 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Daniel H Wolf; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Monica E Calkins; Kosha Ruparel; Mark A Elliott; Ryan D Hopson; Chad T Jackson; Karthik Prabhakaran; Warren B Bilker; Hakon Hakonarson; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: David R Roalf; Kosha Ruparel; Raquel E Gur; Warren Bilker; Raphael Gerraty; Mark A Elliott; R Sean Gallagher; Laura Almasy; Michael F Pogue-Geile; Konasale Prasad; Joel Wood; Vishwajit L Nimgaonkar; Ruben C Gur Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2013-12-23 Impact factor: 3.295