Jian-Ping Zhang1, Todd Lencz, Anil K Malhotra. 1. Division of Psychiatry Research, Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, 75-59 263rd St., Glen Oaks, NY 11004, USA. jzhang1@nshs.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Several lines of evidence suggest that antipsychotic drug efficacy is mediated by dopamine type 2 (D(2)) receptor blockade. Therefore, it seems plausible that variation in the DRD(2) gene is associated with clinical response to antipsychotic drug treatment. The authors conducted the first meta-analysis to examine the relationship between DRD2 polymorphisms and antipsychotic drug response. METHOD: A MEDLINE search of articles available up to December 31, 2008, yielded 18 prospective studies examining DRD2 gene variation and antipsychotic response in schizophrenia patients; of which, 10 independent studies met criteria for inclusion. Clinical response to antipsychotic treatment was defined as a 50% reduction of either the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale total score or Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score at approximately 8 weeks of follow-up evaluation. Odds ratio was the primary effect-size measure and computed for each polymorphism in each study. Sufficient data were available for two DRD2 polymorphisms: -141C Ins/Del and Taq1A. RESULTS: Six studies reported results for the -141C Ins/Del polymorphism (total sample size: N=687). The Del allele carrier was significantly associated with poorer antipsychotic drug response relative to the Ins/Ins genotype. Eight studies assessed the Taq1A polymorphism and antipsychotic response (total sample size: N=748). There was no significant difference in the response rate among A1 allele carriers relative to individuals with the A2/A2 genotype or A2 allele carriers relative to individuals with the A1/A1 genotype. CONCLUSIONS: The DRD2 genetic variation is associated with clinical response to antipsychotic drug treatment. These data may provide proof-of-principle for pharmacogenetic studies in schizophrenia.
OBJECTIVE: Several lines of evidence suggest that antipsychotic drug efficacy is mediated by dopamine type 2 (D(2)) receptor blockade. Therefore, it seems plausible that variation in the DRD(2) gene is associated with clinical response to antipsychotic drug treatment. The authors conducted the first meta-analysis to examine the relationship between DRD2 polymorphisms and antipsychotic drug response. METHOD: A MEDLINE search of articles available up to December 31, 2008, yielded 18 prospective studies examining DRD2 gene variation and antipsychotic response in schizophreniapatients; of which, 10 independent studies met criteria for inclusion. Clinical response to antipsychotic treatment was defined as a 50% reduction of either the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale total score or Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score at approximately 8 weeks of follow-up evaluation. Odds ratio was the primary effect-size measure and computed for each polymorphism in each study. Sufficient data were available for two DRD2 polymorphisms: -141C Ins/Del and Taq1A. RESULTS: Six studies reported results for the -141C Ins/Del polymorphism (total sample size: N=687). The Del allele carrier was significantly associated with poorer antipsychotic drug response relative to the Ins/Ins genotype. Eight studies assessed the Taq1A polymorphism and antipsychotic response (total sample size: N=748). There was no significant difference in the response rate among A1 allele carriers relative to individuals with the A2/A2 genotype or A2 allele carriers relative to individuals with the A1/A1 genotype. CONCLUSIONS: The DRD2 genetic variation is associated with clinical response to antipsychotic drug treatment. These data may provide proof-of-principle for pharmacogenetic studies in schizophrenia.
Authors: E G Jönsson; M M Nöthen; F Grünhage; L Farde; Y Nakashima; P Propping; G C Sedvall Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Rudi Hwang; Takahiro Shinkai; Vincenzo De Luca; Daniel J Müller; Xingqun Ni; Fabio Macciardi; Steven Potkin; Jeffrey A Lieberman; Herbert Y Meltzer; James L Kennedy Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2005-10-15 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: S Silvestri; M V Seeman; J C Negrete; S Houle; C M Shammi; G J Remington; S Kapur; R B Zipursky; A A Wilson; B K Christensen; P Seeman Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Huaiyu Mi; Paul D Thomas; Huijun Z Ring; Ruhong Jiang; Katrin Sangkuhl; Teri E Klein; Russ B Altman Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Sarah Hohmann; Nicoletta Adamo; Benjamin B Lahey; Stephen V Faraone; Tobias Banaschewski Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2015-04-08 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Rebekka Lencer; Jeffrey R Bishop; Margret S H Harris; James L Reilly; Shitalben Patel; Rick Kittles; Konasale M Prasad; Vishwajit L Nimgaonkar; Matcheri S Keshavan; John A Sweeney Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Deepak K Sarpal; Miklos Argyelan; Delbert G Robinson; Philip R Szeszko; Katherine H Karlsgodt; Majnu John; Noah Weissman; Juan A Gallego; John M Kane; Todd Lencz; Anil K Malhotra Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Jeroen P Koning; Jelle Vehof; Huibert Burger; Bob Wilffert; Asmar Al Hadithy; Behrooz Alizadeh; Peter N van Harten; Harold Snieder Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2011-07-13 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Jeffrey R Bishop; James L Reilly; Margret S H Harris; Shitalben R Patel; Rick Kittles; Judith A Badner; Konasale M Prasad; Vishwajit L Nimgaonkar; Matcheri S Keshavan; John A Sweeney Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 4.530