Literature DB >> 20194316

Assessment of the posterior ligamentous complex following acute cervical spine trauma.

Jeffrey A Rihn1, Charles Fisher, James Harrop, William Morrison, Nuo Yang, Alexander R Vaccaro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging is commonly used to assess the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex following cervical trauma, but its accuracy and reliability have not been documented, to our knowledge. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting injury to specific components of the posterior ligamentous complex of the cervical spine.
METHODS: Patients with an acute cervical spine injury that required posterior surgical treatment were prospectively studied. The six components of the posterior ligamentous complex were characterized as intact, incompletely disrupted, or disrupted on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging studies by a radiologist and intraoperatively by two surgeons. Correlation between the magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative findings was determined. The percent agreement, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging as a tool for characterizing the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex were calculated.
RESULTS: Forty-seven consecutive patients with a total of seventy levels of injury were studied. Overall, there was moderate agreement between the magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative findings for the supraspinous and interspinous ligaments (kappa scores of 0.46 and 0.43, respectively) and fair agreement between those for the ligamentum flavum, left and right facet capsules, and cervical fascia (kappa scores of 0.32, 0.31, 0.26, and 0.39, respectively). The sensitivity of the magnetic resonance imaging was greatest for the cervical fascia (100%) and the lowest for the facet capsules (80%). Specificity ranged from 56% (for the facet capsules) to 67% (for the interspinous ligament). The positive predictive value ranged from 42% (for the cervical fascia) to 82% (for the interspinous ligament).
CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging is sensitive for the evaluation of injury to the posterior ligamentous complex in the setting of acute cervical trauma. However, it has a lower positive predictive value and specificity, suggesting that injury to the posterior ligamentous complex may be "over-read" on magnetic resonance images. If magnetic resonance imaging is used in isolation to guide treatment, the high rate of false-positive findings may lead to unnecessary surgery. Other factors, including the morphology of the injury and the neurological status, should be considered as well when devising a treatment plan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20194316     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  9 in total

1.  MRI study of post-traumatic incompetence of posterior ligamentous complex: importance of the supraspinous ligament. Prospective study of 74 traumatic fractures.

Authors:  Javier Pizones; Lorenzo Zúñiga; Felisa Sánchez-Mariscal; Patricia Alvarez; Alejandro Gómez-Rice; Enrique Izquierdo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Ultrasound diagnosis and therapeutic intervention in the spine.

Authors:  Adil S Ahmed; Raahul Ramakrishnan; Vignesh Ramachandran; Shyam S Ramachandran; Kevin Phan; Erik L Antonsen
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

Review 3.  Utility of MRI for cervical spine clearance after blunt traumatic injury: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ajay Malhotra; Xiao Wu; Vivek B Kalra; Holly K Grossetta Nardini; Renu Liu; Khalid M Abbed; Howard P Forman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Imaging findings of flexion type of hangman's fracture; an attempt for a more objective evaluation with newly introduced scoring system.

Authors:  Sawsan Taif; Venugopal K Menon; Asif Alrawi; Ahmed S Alnuaimi; Kishore K Mollahalli; Khalifa Al Ghafri
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Posterior vertebral injury; is this a burst fracture or a flexion-distraction injury?

Authors:  Farzad Omidi-Kashani
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2014-06-15

6.  Coronal Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Improving Diagnostic Accuracy for Posterior Ligamentous Complex Disruption In a Goat Spine Injury Model.

Authors:  Xuee Zhu; Jichen Wang; Dan Zhou; Chong Feng; Zhiwen Dong; Hanxiao Yu
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  The effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in acute traumatic spinal cord injury on motor and sensory function within 6 months post-injury: a study protocol for a two-arm three-stage adaptive, prospective, multi-center, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Iris Leister; Rainer Mittermayr; Georg Mattiassich; Ludwig Aigner; Thomas Haider; Lukas Machegger; Harald Kindermann; Anja Grazer-Horacek; Johannes Holfeld; Wolfgang Schaden
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Evaluation of the subaxial injury classification system.

Authors:  A F Joaquim; B Lawrence; M Daubs; D Brodke; A A Patel
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2011-07

Review 9.  Subaxial cervical spine trauma: evaluation and surgical decision-making.

Authors:  Andrei F Joaquim; Alpesh A Patel
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2013-09-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.