Literature DB >> 20194014

Accounting for conformational changes during protein-protein docking.

Martin Zacharias1.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional structures of only a small fraction of known protein-protein complexes are currently known. Meanwhile, computational methods are of increasing importance to provide structural models for known protein-protein interactions. Current protein-protein docking methods are often successful if experimentally determined partner proteins undergo little conformational changes upon binding. However, the realistic and computationally efficient treatment of conformational changes especially of the protein backbone during docking remains a challenge. New promising approaches of flexible refinement, ensemble docking and explicit inclusion of flexibility during the entire docking process have been developed. A significant fraction of known protein-protein interactions can be modeled based on homology to known protein-protein complexes which in many cases also requires efficient flexible refinement to provide accurate structural models.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20194014     DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2010.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol        ISSN: 0959-440X            Impact factor:   6.809


  48 in total

1.  A generalized approach to sampling backbone conformations with RosettaDock for CAPRI rounds 13-19.

Authors:  Aroop Sircar; Sidhartha Chaudhury; Krishna Praneeth Kilambi; Monica Berrondo; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-11-15

2.  Protein-protein docking benchmark version 4.0.

Authors:  Howook Hwang; Thom Vreven; Joël Janin; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-11-15

3.  A structure-based benchmark for protein-protein binding affinity.

Authors:  Panagiotis L Kastritis; Iain H Moal; Howook Hwang; Zhiping Weng; Paul A Bates; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Joël Janin
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Protein-Protein Docking Using EMAP in CHARMM and Support Vector Machine: Application to Ab/Ag Complexes.

Authors:  Jon D Wright; Karen Sargsyan; Xiongwu Wu; Bernard R Brooks; Carmay Lim
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  How good is automated protein docking?

Authors:  Dima Kozakov; Dmitri Beglov; Tanggis Bohnuud; Scott E Mottarella; Bing Xia; David R Hall; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-10-17

6.  Global and local structural similarity in protein-protein complexes: implications for template-based docking.

Authors:  Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-10-17

7.  Molecular motions in drug design: the coming age of the metadynamics method.

Authors:  Xevi Biarnés; Salvatore Bongarzone; Attilio Vittorio Vargiu; Paolo Carloni; Paolo Ruggerone
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Integrating atom-based and residue-based scoring functions for protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Thom Vreven; Howook Hwang; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Pushing the Backbone in Protein-Protein Docking.

Authors:  Daisuke Kuroda; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  Designing coarse grained-and atom based-potentials for protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Dror Tobi
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2010-11-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.