Literature DB >> 20192935

Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy, periprostatic local anesthesia and pain tolerance.

Mustafa Hiros1, Mirsad Selimovic, Hajrudin Spahovic, Sabina Sadovic, Ediba Spuzic-Celic.   

Abstract

We have evaluated objectively pain tolerance in transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS) using local periprostatic per rectal anesthesia as compared to the conventional method. From November 2008 to May 2009, 90 patients underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy at Department of Urology, Clinical Center University Sarajevo. 90 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomized into 3 groups of 30 patients each. Group 1 received periprostatic local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine, group 2 received Voltaren supp placed in rectum an hour before biopsy while group 3 received no local anesthesia. Pain scale responses were analyzed for each aspect of the biopsy procedure with a visual analog scale of 0-none to 10-maximal. There was no difference between the 3 groups in pain scores during digital rectal examination, intrarectal injection and probe insertion. The mean pain scores during needle insertion in group 1 receiving periprostatic nerve block and in group 2 receiving Voltaren supp were 3,10 +/- 2,32 and 5,15 +/- 2,01 respectively. In group 3 (no local anesthesia), mean pain scores were 6,06 +/- 2,95 which was found to be significantly different (p < 0,001). However, morbidity after the biopsy was not statistically different between all 3 groups. TRUS-guided prostate biopsy is a traumatic and painful experience, but the periprostatic blockage use is clearly associated with more tolerance and patient comfort during the exam. It is an easy, safe, acceptable and reproducible technique and should be considered for all patients undergoing TRUS biopsy regardless of age or number of biopsies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20192935     DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2010.2740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci        ISSN: 1512-8601            Impact factor:   3.363


  7 in total

1.  Patients' experience with MRI-guided in-bore biopsy versus TRUS-guided biopsy in prostate cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Silvia Francesca Maria Pizzoli; Giulia Marton; Paola Pricolo; Serena Oliveri; Paul Summers; Giuseppe Petralia; Gabriella Pravettoni
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2020-10-20

Review 2.  The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chen Jie; Liu Rongbo; Tan Ping
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Local anesthesia for transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mingchao Li; Zhengyun Wang; Hao Li; Jun Yang; Ke Rao; Tao Wang; Shaogang Wang; Jihong Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A comparison of pain control and complications using three different ways of anesthesia in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Hamid Mazdak; Amir Mohamad Abtahi; Fatemeh Momeni; Mohammad Hossein Izadpanahi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 1.852

5.  What is the most effective local anesthesia for transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy of the prostate? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 47 randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Do Kyung Kim; Joo Yong Lee; Jae Hung Jung; Yoon Soo Hah; Kyo Chul Koo; Kwang Suk Lee; Byung Ha Chung; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Effectiveness of periprostatic block to prevent pain in transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Herney Andres Garcia-Perdomo; Natalia Guzman Mejia; Lizeth Fernandez; Jorge Carbonell
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2019-04-08

Review 7.  Transrectal ultrasound biopsy of the prostate: does it still have a role in prostate cancer diagnosis?

Authors:  Andrew Moe; Dickon Hayne
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.