BACKGROUND: Dosing frequency is an important determinant of regimen effectiveness. Methods. To compare efficacy of once-daily (QD) versus twice-daily (BID) antiretroviral therapy, we randomized human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive, treatment-naive patients tolopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) administered at a dosage of 400 mg of lopinavir and 100 mg of ritonavir BID (n = 160) or 800 mg of lopinavir and 200 mg of ritonavir QD (n = 161), plus either emtricitabine 200 mg QD and extended-release stavudine at a dosage of 100 mg QD or tenofovir at a dosage of 300 mg QD. Randomization was stratified by screening HIV RNA level <100,000 copies/mL versus > or = 100,000 copies/mL. The primary efficacy end point was sustained virologic response (SVR; defined as reaching and maintaining an HIV RNA level <200 copies/mL) through week 48. RESULTS:Subjects were 78% male, 33% Hispanic, and 34% black. A total of 82% of subjects completed the study, and 71% continued to receive the initially assigned dosage schedule. The probability of SVR did not differ significantly for the BID versus QD comparison, with an absolute proportional difference of 0.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.07 to 0.12). The comparison depended on the screening RNA stratum (P=.038); in the higher RNA stratum, the probability of SVR was significantly better in the BID arm than in the QD arm: 0.89 (95% CI, 0.79-0.94) versus 0.76 (95% CI, 0.64-0.84), a difference of 0.13 (95% CI, 0.01-0.25). Lopinavir trough plasma concentrations were higher with BID dosing. Adherence to prescribed doses of LPV/r was 90.6% in the QD arm versus 79.9% in the BID arm (P<.001). Conclusions. Although subjects assigned to QD regimens had better adherence, overall treatment outcomes were similar in the QD and BID arms. Subjects with HIV RNA levels > or =100,000 copies/mL had better SVR with BID regimens at 48 weeks, which suggests a possible advantage in this setting for more frequent dosing. Clinical trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00036452.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Dosing frequency is an important determinant of regimen effectiveness. Methods. To compare efficacy of once-daily (QD) versus twice-daily (BID) antiretroviral therapy, we randomized human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive, treatment-naive patients to lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) administered at a dosage of 400 mg of lopinavir and 100 mg of ritonavirBID (n = 160) or 800 mg of lopinavir and 200 mg of ritonavir QD (n = 161), plus either emtricitabine 200 mg QD and extended-release stavudine at a dosage of 100 mg QD or tenofovir at a dosage of 300 mg QD. Randomization was stratified by screening HIV RNA level <100,000 copies/mL versus > or = 100,000 copies/mL. The primary efficacy end point was sustained virologic response (SVR; defined as reaching and maintaining an HIV RNA level <200 copies/mL) through week 48. RESULTS: Subjects were 78% male, 33% Hispanic, and 34% black. A total of 82% of subjects completed the study, and 71% continued to receive the initially assigned dosage schedule. The probability of SVR did not differ significantly for the BID versus QD comparison, with an absolute proportional difference of 0.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.07 to 0.12). The comparison depended on the screening RNA stratum (P=.038); in the higher RNA stratum, the probability of SVR was significantly better in the BID arm than in the QD arm: 0.89 (95% CI, 0.79-0.94) versus 0.76 (95% CI, 0.64-0.84), a difference of 0.13 (95% CI, 0.01-0.25). Lopinavir trough plasma concentrations were higher with BID dosing. Adherence to prescribed doses of LPV/r was 90.6% in the QD arm versus 79.9% in the BID arm (P<.001). Conclusions. Although subjects assigned to QD regimens had better adherence, overall treatment outcomes were similar in the QD and BID arms. Subjects with HIV RNA levels > or =100,000 copies/mL had better SVR with BID regimens at 48 weeks, which suggests a possible advantage in this setting for more frequent dosing. Clinical trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00036452.
Authors: Naser L Rezk; Richard R Tidwell; Angela D M Kashuba Journal: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci Date: 2004-06-15 Impact factor: 3.205
Authors: Laetitia Comté; Bernard Vrijens; Eric Tousset; Paul Gérard; John Urquhart Journal: J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Date: 2007-05-12 Impact factor: 2.745
Authors: Margaret A Johnson; Joseph C Gathe; Daniel Podzamczer; Jean-Michel Molina; Christian T Naylor; Yi-Lin Chiu; Martin S King; Thomas J Podsadecki; George J Hanna; Scott C Brun Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2006-10-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Joseph J Eron; Judith Feinberg; Harold A Kessler; Harold W Horowitz; Mallory D Witt; Felix F Carpio; David A Wheeler; Peter Ruane; Donna Mildvan; Bienvenido G Yangco; Richard Bertz; Barry Bernstein; Martin S King; Eugene Sun Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2004-01-07 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Edward J Mills; Jean B Nachega; David R Bangsberg; Sonal Singh; Beth Rachlis; Ping Wu; Kumanan Wilson; Iain Buchan; Christopher J Gill; Curtis Cooper Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Parya Saberi; Torsten B Neilands; Eric Vittinghoff; Mallory O Johnson; Margaret Chesney; Susan E Cohn Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2015-01-23 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Melanie A Thompson; Michael J Mugavero; K Rivet Amico; Victoria A Cargill; Larry W Chang; Robert Gross; Catherine Orrell; Frederick L Altice; David R Bangsberg; John G Bartlett; Curt G Beckwith; Nadia Dowshen; Christopher M Gordon; Tim Horn; Princy Kumar; James D Scott; Michael J Stirratt; Robert H Remien; Jane M Simoni; Jean B Nachega Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-03-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Qing Ma; Barry S Zingman; Amneris E Luque; Margaret A Fischl; Barbara M Gripshover; Charles S Venuto; Robin DiFrancesco; Alan Forrest; Gene D Morse Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: Heather J Ribaudo; Kimberly Y Smith; Gregory K Robbins; Charles Flexner; Richard Haubrich; Yun Chen; Margaret A Fischl; Bruce R Schackman; Sharon A Riddler; Roy M Gulick Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Lei Hua; Janet W Andersen; Eric S Daar; Marshall J Glesby; Kimberly Hollabaugh; Camlin Tierney Journal: AIDS Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 4.177