Literature DB >> 20191409

School furniture match to students' anthropometry in the Gaza Strip.

Salah R Agha1.   

Abstract

This study aimed at comparing primary school students' anthropometry to the dimensions of school furniture and determining whether the furniture used matches the students' anthropometry. A sample of 600 male students, whose ages were between 6 and 11 years, from five primary schools in the Gaza Strip governorates participated in the study. Several students' body dimensions were measured. The dimensions measured included elbow-seat height, shoulder height, knee height, popliteal height and buttock-popliteal length. Measurements of the dimensions of the classroom furniture indicated that there was a considerable mismatch between the students' body dimensions and the classroom furniture. The mismatches in seat height, seat depth and desk height occurred for 99% of the students, while the mismatch for the back rest height was only 35%. Two design specifications were proposed in order to decrease the mismatch percentage based on the data obtained. The two proposed designs showed a considerable improvement in the match percentages as compared to the existing design. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE: Having identified mismatches between the dimensions of the school furniture used in primary schools in the Gaza Strip, two new design specifications are proposed and shown to improve match with the students' anthropometric dimensions. The findings of the study are also an important addition to local knowledge on school children's anthropometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20191409     DOI: 10.1080/00140130903398366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

1.  Ergonomic evaluation of school furniture in Slovenia: From primary school to university.

Authors:  Nastja Podrekar Loredan; Kaja Kastelic; Michael David Burnard; Nejc Šarabon
Journal:  Work       Date:  2022

2.  Back pain in elementary schoolchildren is related to screen habits.

Authors:  Erivelton Fernandes França; Michel Monteiro Macedo; Fernando Francisco Pazello Mafra; Gabrielle Mitico Miyake; Romildo Torres da Silva; Tania Regina de França; Thyago Ribeiro Dos Santos; João Pedro da Silva Junior; Victor Keihan Rodrigues Matsudo; Nelson Morini Junior; Eduardo Natali Della Valentina; Fábio Dupart Nascimento; Rodrigo Álvaro Brandão Lopes Martins
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2020-07-29

3.  Developing a Multi-Criteria Decision Making approach to compare types of classroom furniture considering mismatches for anthropometric measures of university students.

Authors:  Pooya Khoshabi; Erfan Nejati; Seyyede Fatemeh Ahmadi; Ali Chegini; Ahmad Makui; Rouzbeh Ghousi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Classroom Furniture Mismatch and Back Pain Among Adolescent School-Children in Abha City, Southwestern Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Abdullah Assiri; Ahmed A Mahfouz; Nabil J Awadalla; Ahmed Y Abolyazid; Medhat Shalaby; Ahmed Abogamal; Abdullah Alsabaani; Fatima Riaz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Ergonomic suitability of educational furniture and possible health implications in a university setting.

Authors:  Nse A Odunaiya; Dolapo D Owonuwa; Oluwafemi O Oguntibeju
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2014-01-21

6.  Ergonomic considerations for designing truck drivers' seats: The case of Bangladesh.

Authors:  Pobitra Halder; Tamanna Mahmud; Eity Sarker; ChitraLekha Karmaker; Sazal Kundu; Savankumar Patel; Adi Setiawan; Kalpit Shah
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 2.708

7.  Teachers' Perspective on Strategies to Reduce Sedentary Behavior in Educational Institutions.

Authors:  Nastja Podrekar; Kaja Kastelic; Nejc Šarabon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.