Literature DB >> 20190308

The implications of damage to the lateral femoral condyle on medial unicompartmental knee replacement.

B J L Kendrick1, R Rout, N J Bottomley, H Pandit, H S Gill, A J Price, C A F Dodd, D W Murray.   

Abstract

With medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis (OA) there is occasionally a full-thickness ulcer of the cartilage on the medial side of the lateral femoral condyle. It is not clear whether this should be considered a contraindication to unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). The aim of this study was to determine why these ulcers occur, and whether they compromise the outcome of UKR. Case studies of knees with medial OA suggest that cartilage lesions on the medial side of the lateral condyle are caused by impingement on the lateral tibial spine as a result of the varus deformity and tibial subluxation. Following UKR the varus and the subluxation are corrected, so that impingement is prevented and the damaged part of the lateral femoral condyle is not transmitting load. An illustrative case report is presented. Out of 769 knees with OA of the medial compartment treated with the Oxford UKR, 59 (7.7%) had partial-thickness cartilage loss and 20 (2.6%) had a full-thickness cartilage deficit on the medial side of the lateral condyle. The mean Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at the last follow-up at a mean of four years was 41.9 (13 to 48) in those with partial-thickness cartilage loss and 41.0 (20 to 48) in those with full-thickness loss. In those with normal or superficially damaged cartilage the mean was 39.5 (5 to 48) and 39.7 (8 to 48), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the pre-operative OKS, the final review OKS or of change in the score in the various groups. We conclude that in medial compartment OA, damage to the medial side of the lateral femoral condyle is caused by impingement on the tibial spine and should not be considered a contraindication to an Oxford UKR, even if there is extensive full-thickness ulceration of the cartilage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20190308     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B3.23561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  13 in total

Review 1.  How to read a postoperative knee replacement radiograph.

Authors:  Nawfal Al-Hadithy; Madhavan C Papanna; Sana Farooq; Yegappan Kalairajah
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Effect of arthritis in other compartment after unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ali Mofidi; Bo Lu; Johannes F Plate; Jason E Lang; Gary G Poehling; Riyaz H Jinnah
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-06-16

3.  CORR Insights ®: The Oxford unicompartmental knee fails at a high rate in a high-volume knee practice.

Authors:  John M Clark
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  [Unicompartimental joint (Oxford III) with mobile bearing : Minimally invasive implantation of a in the medial compartiment].

Authors:  W Petersen; S Metzlaff; P Forkel; A Achtnich; K Schmoranzer; P Hertel
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  Varus knee osteoarthritis: how can we identify ACL insufficiency?

Authors:  Wenzel Waldstein; Christian Merle; Jad Bou Monsef; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement for the treatment of arthritis progression after medial unicompartmental replacement.

Authors:  H Pandit; F Mancuso; C Jenkins; W F M Jackson; A J Price; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  No difference in survivorship after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with or without an intact anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Adam Boissonneault; Hemant Pandit; Elise Pegg; Cathy Jenkins; Harinderjit Singh Gill; Christopher A F Dodd; Christopher L M H Gibbons; David W Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Clinical validation and accuracy testing of a radiographic decision aid for unicondylar knee arthroplasty patient selection in midterm follow-up.

Authors:  Lars-Rene Tuecking; P Savov; T Richter; H Windhagen; M Ettinger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Aetiology of lateral progression of arthritis following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a case-control study.

Authors:  H Pandit; B Spiegelberg; A Clavé; C McGrath; A D Liddle; D W Murray
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-01-25

10.  Radiological Decision Aid to determine suitability for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: development and preliminary validation.

Authors:  T W Hamilton; H G Pandit; A V Lombardi; J B Adams; C R Oosthuizen; A Clavé; C A F Dodd; K R Berend; D W Murray
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.