Literature DB >> 20190300

Bone-turnover markers in fracture healing.

G Cox1, T A Einhorn, C Tzioupis, P V Giannoudis.   

Abstract

Biochemical markers of bone-turnover have long been used to complement the radiological assessment of patients with metabolic bone disease. Their implementation in daily clinical practice has been helpful in the understanding of the pathogenesis of osteoporosis, the selection of the optimal dose and the understanding of the progression of the onset and resolution of treatment. Since they are derived from both cortical and trabecular bone, they reflect the metabolic activity of the entire skeleton rather than that of individual cells or the process of mineralisation. Quantitative changes in skeletal-turnover can be assessed easily and non-invasively by the measurement of bone-turnover markers. They are commonly subdivided into three categories; 1) bone-resorption markers, 2) osteoclast regulatory proteins and 3) bone-formation markers. Because of the rapidly accumulating new knowledge of bone matrix biochemistry, attempts have been made to use them in the interpretation and characterisation of various stages of the healing of fractures. Early knowledge of the individual progress of a fracture could help to avoid delayed or nonunion by enabling modification of the host's biological response. The levels of bone-turnover markers vary throughout the course of fracture repair with their rates of change being dependent on the size of the fracture and the time that it will take to heal. However, their short-term biological variability, the relatively low bone specificity exerted, given that the production and destruction of collagen is not limited to bone, as well as the influence of the host's metabolism on their concentration, produce considerable intra- and inter-individual variability in their interpretation. Despite this, the possible role of bone-turnover markers in the assessment of progression to union, the risks of delayed or nonunion and the impact of innovations to accelerate fracture healing must not be ignored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20190300     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B3.22787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  28 in total

1.  Serum 25(OH)D is associated with an altered bone turnover marker response after a hip fracture.

Authors:  Christopher C Stewart; Nathan N O'Hara; Denise Orwig; Marc C Hochberg; Sheila Sprague; Jay Magaziner; Gerard P Slobogean
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Image Analysis Software as a Strategy to Improve the Radiographic Determination of Fracture Healing.

Authors:  Jeffrey Duryea; Christopher Evans; Vaida Glatt
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  A fracture does not adversely affect bone mineral density responses after teriparatide treatment.

Authors:  Aasis Unnanuntana; Quang V Ton; John P Kleimeyer; Joseph T Nguyen; Joseph M Lane
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Acute bone changes after lower limb amputation resulting from traumatic injury.

Authors:  D A Bemben; V D Sherk; W J J Ertl; M G Bemben
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Expression of bone morphogenetic protein 2 in rabbit radial defect site with different lengths.

Authors:  Guo-Zhu Hou; Feng Xu; Wen-Ju Li; Xiao-Meng Zhu; Xing-Hua Song; Yu-Lin Zhan
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15

6.  Serum proteomic assessment of the progression of fracture healing.

Authors:  Amira I Hussein; Christian Mancini; Kyle E Lybrand; Margaret E Cooke; Heather E Matheny; Brenna L Hogue; Paul Tornetta; Louis C Gerstenfeld
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Can impaired diaphyseal fracture healing be predicted early?: A cohort study of biomarkers.

Authors:  Sabir Ali; Ajai Singh; Manish Yadav; Salma Siddiqui; Vaishnavi Pandey; Abbas Ali Mahdi; Rajeshwer Nath Srivastava
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-04-29

8.  Monitoring of the first stages of bone healing with microdialysis.

Authors:  Yvonne Förster; Wenling Gao; Anne Demmrich; Ute Hempel; Lorenz C Hofbauer; Stefan Rammelt
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 9.  Current Options for Determining Fracture Union.

Authors:  Saam Morshed
Journal:  Adv Med       Date:  2014-09-14

10.  Targeting pro-inflammatory cytokines following joint injury: acute intra-articular inhibition of interleukin-1 following knee injury prevents post-traumatic arthritis.

Authors:  Bridgette D Furman; Daniel S Mangiapani; Evan Zeitler; Karsyn N Bailey; Phillip H Horne; Janet L Huebner; Virginia B Kraus; Farshid Guilak; Steven A Olson
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.