Literature DB >> 20190174

Pedigree analysis of 5 swine breeds in the United States and the implications for genetic conservation.

C S Welsh1, T S Stewart, C Schwab, H D Blackburn.   

Abstract

Globally, genetic diversity of livestock populations is contracting. Knowing the true extent of the contraction is needed to develop effective conservation strategies. Although contractions of genetic diversity have been documented at the breed level, little within breed documentation has occurred. This situation is no different for US swine breeds. Therefore, the objective of this study was to establish an inbreeding baseline for 5 pig breeds via pedigree records extracted from purebred registrations to each breed association for Berkshire (n = 116,758), Duroc (n = 878,480), Hampshire (n = 744,270), Landrace (n = 126,566), and Yorkshire (n = 727,268). For all breeds the number of registrations peaked after 1990 and declined since that time. The breeder structure was analyzed for Berkshire and Duroc; the average breeder registered pigs for 4.0 yr for both breeds. Breeders were grouped by longevity and herd size, and the inbreeding levels for the current population (pigs born 2006 and later) were evaluated. Presently, more than 99% of all pigs are inbred with the majority having inbreeding less than 10%. The range for percentage of animals that are more than 25% inbred ranged from 1.16% for Yorkshire to 6.09% for Berkshire. The greatest inbreeding for all animals within a breed ranged from 51% for Landrace and 65% for Yorkshire. Sires were grouped into 10 percentiles based on number of great-grandprogeny (GGP) produced; for all breeds, the top 10 percentile accounted for more than 75% of all GGP. Sixty percent of all sires produced less than 1% of all GGP, indicating few males are contributing to future generations. Generations ranged from 17 to 19 per breed with a generation interval ranging from 1.65 yr for Berkshire to 2.21 yr for Yorkshire. Mean inbreeding (%) at generation 17 (the most generations computed across breeds), rate of inbreeding per generation, and effective population size were 12.3, 0.0065, and 77 for Berkshire; 11.8, 0.0044, and 113 for Duroc; 6.8, 0.0046, and 109 for Hampshire; 17.9, 0.0067, and 74 for Landrace; and 8.0, 0.0044, and 113 for Yorkshire, respectively. The 2 breeds with fewest registrations, Berkshire and Landrace, had greater inbreeding rates and smaller effective population sizes, suggesting a need for more immediate conservation efforts. This analysis provides a basis for future monitoring of the genetic diversity of pig breeds and serves as a basis for planning conservation activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20190174     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2009-2537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  14 in total

1.  Genetic architecture of a composite beef cattle population.

Authors:  El Hamidi Hay; Sajjad Toghiani; Andrew J Roberts; Tiago Paim; Larry Alexander Kuehn; Harvey D Blackburn
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.338

2.  Genomic Diversity in Pig (Sus scrofa) and its Comparison with Human and other Livestock.

Authors:  Chunyan Zhang; Graham Plastow
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.236

3.  Estimation of linkage disequilibrium in four US pig breeds.

Authors:  Yvonne M Badke; Ronald O Bates; Catherine W Ernst; Clint Schwab; Juan P Steibel
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Methods of tagSNP selection and other variables affecting imputation accuracy in swine.

Authors:  Yvonne M Badke; Ronald O Bates; Catherine W Ernst; Clint Schwab; Justin Fix; Curtis P Van Tassell; Juan P Steibel
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.797

5.  Inbreeding and genetic diversity in three imported Swine breeds in china using pedigree data.

Authors:  G Q Tang; J Xue; M J Lian; R F Yang; T F Liu; Z Y Zeng; A A Jiang; Y Z Jiang; L Zhu; L Bai; Z Wang; X W Li
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.509

6.  Evaluation of inbreeding and genetic variability of five pig breeds in czech republic.

Authors:  E Krupa; E Žáková; Z Krupová
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.509

7.  Genetic diversity, extent of linkage disequilibrium and persistence of gametic phase in Canadian pigs.

Authors:  Daniela A Grossi; Mohsen Jafarikia; Luiz F Brito; Marcos E Buzanskas; Mehdi Sargolzaei; Flávio S Schenkel
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 2.797

8.  A Mix of Old British and Modern European Breeds: Genomic Prediction of Breed Composition of Smallholder Pigs in Uganda.

Authors:  Brian Martin Babigumira; Johann Sölkner; Gábor Mészáros; Christina Pfeiffer; Craig R G Lewis; Emily Ouma; Maria Wurzinger; Karen Marshall
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Methods to estimate effective population size using pedigree data: Examples in dog, sheep, cattle and horse.

Authors:  Grégoire Leroy; Tristan Mary-Huard; Etienne Verrier; Sophie Danvy; Eleonore Charvolin; Coralie Danchin-Burge
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Improving the accuracy of whole genome prediction for complex traits using the results of genome wide association studies.

Authors:  Zhe Zhang; Ulrike Ober; Malena Erbe; Hao Zhang; Ning Gao; Jinlong He; Jiaqi Li; Henner Simianer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.