Literature DB >> 20190173

Predicting red meat yields in carcasses from beef-type and calf-fed Holstein steers using the United States Department of Agriculture calculated yield grade.

T E Lawrence1, N A Elam, M F Miller, J C Brooks, G G Hilton, D L VanOverbeke, F K McKeith, J Killefer, T H Montgomery, D M Allen, D B Griffin, R J Delmore, W T Nichols, M N Streeter, D A Yates, J P Hutcheson.   

Abstract

Analyses were conducted to evaluate the ability of the USDA yield grade equation to detect differences in subprimal yield of beef-type steers and calf-fed Holstein steers that had been fed zilpaterol hydrochloride (ZH; Intervet Inc., Millsboro, DE) as well as those that had not been fed ZH. Beef-type steer (n = 801) and calf-fed Holstein steer (n = 235) carcasses were fabricated into subprimal cuts and trim. Simple correlations between calculated yield grades and total red meat yields ranged from -0.56 to -0.62 for beef-type steers. Reliable correlations from calf-fed Holstein steers were unobtainable; the probability of a type I error met or exceeded 0.39. Linear models were developed for the beef-type steers to predict total red meat yield based on calculated USDA yield grade within each ZH duration. At an average calculated USDA yield grade of 2.9, beef-type steer carcasses that had not been fed ZH had an estimated 69.4% red meat yield, whereas those fed ZH had an estimated 70.7% red meat yield. These results indicate that feeding ZH increased red meat yield by 1.3% at a constant calculated yield grade. However, these data also suggest that the calculated USDA yield grade score is a poor and variable estimator (adjusted R(2) of 0.31 to 0.38) of total red meat yield of beef-type steer carcasses, regardless of ZH feeding. Moreover, no relationship existed (adjusted R(2) of 0.00 to 0.01) for calf-fed Holstein steer carcasses, suggesting the USDA yield grade is not a valid estimate of calf-fed Holstein red meat yield.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20190173     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2009-2739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  5 in total

1.  Supplementing an immunomodulatory feed ingredient to improve thermoregulation and performance of finishing beef cattle under heat stress conditions.

Authors:  Eduardo A Colombo; Reinaldo F Cooke; Allison A Millican; Kelsey M Schubach; Giovanna N Scatolin; Bruna Rett; Alice P Brandão
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  A meta-analysis of zilpaterol and ractopamine effects on feedlot performance, carcass traits and shear strength of meat in cattle.

Authors:  Ian J Lean; John M Thompson; Frank R Dunshea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Supplementing organic-complexed or inorganic Co, Cu, Mn, and Zn to beef cows during gestation: postweaning responses of offspring reared as replacement heifers or feeder cattle.

Authors:  Kelsey M Harvey; Reinaldo F Cooke; Eduardo A Colombo; Bruna Rett; Osvaldo A de Sousa; Lorin M Harvey; Jason R Russell; Ky G Pohler; Alice P Brandão
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Supplementing a blend of magnesium oxide to feedlot cattle: effects on ruminal, physiological, and productive responses.

Authors:  Eduardo A Colombo; Reinaldo F Cooke; Ana Clara R Araújo; Kelsey M Harvey; Ky G Pohler; Alice P Brandão
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Crossbreeding beef sires to dairy cows: cow, feedlot, and carcass performance.

Authors:  Blake A Foraker; Michael A Ballou; Dale R Woerner
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.