Literature DB >> 20190167

Effect of bovine respiratory disease during preconditioning on subsequent feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, and beef attributes.

B P Holland1, L O Burciaga-Robles, D L VanOverbeke, J N Shook, D L Step, C J Richards, C R Krehbiel.   

Abstract

Heifers with expected increased risk of bovine respiratory disease (BRD; n = 360; initial BW = 241.3 +/- 16.6 kg) were assembled at a Kentucky order-buyer facility and delivered to Stillwater, OK, in September 2007 to determine the effects of clinical BRD observed during preconditioning on subsequent feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, and meat attributes. During a 63-d preconditioning period, morbidity and mortality attributed to BRD were 57.6 and 8.6%, respectively. Immediately after preconditioning, heifers were grouped according to health outcome category and allotted to finishing pens (5 to 7 heifers/pen). Heifers were never treated for BRD (0X; n = 9 pens), treated 1 time (1X; n = 9 pens), 2 times (2X; n = 6 pens), 3 times (3X; n = 6 pens), or designated as chronically ill (CI; n = 2 pens). Arrival BW was not different (P = 0.21) among treatment categories. However, disease incidence during preconditioning decreased (P < 0.001) growth, resulting in BW of 318, 305, 294, 273, and 243 kg for 0X, 1X, 2X, 3X, and CI, respectively, at the start of the finishing phase. Estimates on the LM, taken by ultrasound on d 65 and 122, were combined with BW and visual appraisal to target common average endpoint within category and block. On average, heifers were slaughtered on d 163 for 0X, 1X, and 2X, d 182 for 3X, and d 189 for CI (P < 0.01). Final BW was similar (P > or = 0.18) for heifers treated 0, 1, 2, or 3 times, but heifers deemed CI weighed less (P = 0.01) than 3X heifers. Considering the finishing phase only, ADG was linearly increased (P < 0.001) with increasing BRD treatments, but was linearly decreased (P = 0.003) as BRD treatments increased from arrival to slaughter. Therefore, G:F was greater (P = 0.007) for CI than 3X and linearly increased (P = 0.002) from 0X to 3X. Similar to BW, HCW was less (P = 0.03) for CI than 3X. Marbling score tended (P = 0.06) to decrease linearly as the number of treatments increased, but no other differences (P > or = 0.24) in carcass traits were detected. No differences were observed in beef tenderness (P = 0.65), and no consistent trends were noted in retail display or palatability data. Less than 20 additional days on feed were required for heifers treated 3 times to have similar BW and carcass characteristics to heifers never treated for BRD. Segregating animals with multiple BRD treatments and feeding them to an acceptable carcass endpoint may be a viable strategy for increasing value of animals treated for BRD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20190167     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2009-2428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  13 in total

1.  An evaluation of the economic effects of bovine respiratory disease on animal performance, carcass traits, and economic outcomes in feedlot cattle defined using four BRD diagnosis methods.

Authors:  Claudia Blakebrough-Hall; Joe P McMeniman; Luciano A González
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Linking disease epidemiology and livestock productivity: The case of bovine respiratory disease in France.

Authors:  Alexis Delabouglise; Andrew James; Jean-François Valarcher; Sara Hagglünd; Didier Raboisson; Jonathan Rushton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Cattle with increased severity of bovine respiratory disease complex exhibit decreased capacity to protect against histone cytotoxicity.

Authors:  J A Matera; B K Wilson; J A Hernandez Gifford; D L Step; C R Krehbiel; C A Gifford
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 4.  BILL E. KUNKLE INTERDISCIPLINARY BEEF SYMPOSIUM: Impact of mineral and vitamin status on beef cattle immune function and health.

Authors:  E B Kegley; J J Ball; P A Beck
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Scientific Opinion on the welfare of cattle kept for beef production and the welfare in intensive calf farming systems.

Authors: 
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2012-05-15

Review 6.  Bovine respiratory microbiota of feedlot cattle and its association with disease.

Authors:  Jianmin Chai; Sarah F Capik; Beth Kegley; John T Richeson; Jeremy G Powell; Jiangchao Zhao
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.683

7.  Multipopulational transcriptome analysis of post-weaned beef cattle at arrival further validates candidate biomarkers for predicting clinical bovine respiratory disease.

Authors:  Matthew A Scott; Amelia R Woolums; Cyprianna E Swiderski; Andy D Perkins; Bindu Nanduri; David R Smith; Brandi B Karisch; William B Epperson; John R Blanton
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Use of nCounter mRNA profiling to identify at-arrival gene expression patterns for predicting bovine respiratory disease in beef cattle.

Authors:  Matthew A Scott; Amelia R Woolums; Cyprianna E Swiderski; Alexis C Thompson; Andy D Perkins; Bindu Nanduri; Brandi B Karisch; Dan R Goehl
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Impact of respiratory disease, diarrhea, otitis and arthritis on mortality and carcass traits in white veal calves.

Authors:  Bart Pardon; Miel Hostens; Luc Duchateau; Jeroen Dewulf; Koen De Bleecker; Piet Deprez
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Effect of bovine respiratory disease during the receiving period on steer finishing performance, efficiency, carcass characteristics, and lung scores.

Authors:  B K Wilson; D L Step; C L Maxwell; C A Gifford; C J Richards; C R Krehbiel
Journal:  Prof Anim Sci       Date:  2017-01-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.