Literature DB >> 20190012

Monoaminergic psychomotor stimulants: discriminative stimulus effects and dopamine efflux.

Rajeev I Desai1, Carol A Paronis, Jared Martin, Ramya Desai, Jack Bergman.   

Abstract

The present studies were conducted to investigate the relationship between discriminative stimulus effects of indirectly acting monoaminergic psychostimulants and their ability to increase extracellular levels of dopamine (DA) in the nucleus accumbens (NAcb) shell. First, the behavioral effects of methamphetamine (MA), cocaine (COC), 1-[2-[bis(4-fluorophenyl-)methoxy]ethyl]-4-(3-phenylpropyl)piperazine (GBR 12909), d-amphetamine, and methylphenidate were established in rats trained to discriminate intraperitoneal injections of 0.3 mg/kg MA from saline. In other studies, in vivo microdialysis was used to determine the effects of MA, COC, and GBR 12909 on extracellular DA levels in the NAcb shell. Results show that all drugs produced dose-related and full substitution for the discriminative stimulus effects of 0.3 mg/kg MA. In microdialysis studies, cumulatively administered MA (0.3-3 mg/kg), COC (3-56 mg/kg), and GBR 12909 (3-30 mg/kg) produced dose-dependent increases in DA efflux in the NAcb shell to maxima of approximately 1200 to 1300% of control values. The increase in DA levels produced by MA and COC was rapid and short-lived, whereas the effect of GBR 12909 was slower and longer lasting. Dose-related increases in MA lever selection produced by MA, COC, and GBR 12909 corresponded with graded increases in DA levels in the NAcb shell. Doses of MA, COC, and GBR 12909 that produced full substitution increased DA levels to approximately 200 to 400% of control values. Finally, cumulatively administered MA produced comparable changes in DA levels in both naive and 0.3 mg/kg MA-trained rats. These latter results suggest that sensitization of DA release does not play a prominent role in the discriminative stimulus effects of psychomotor stimulants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20190012      PMCID: PMC2879939          DOI: 10.1124/jpet.110.165746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  38 in total

1.  Evaluation of the discriminative effects of morphine in the rat.

Authors:  H E Shannon; S G Holtzman
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  Amphetamine, cocaine, and fencamfamine: relationship between locomotor and stereotypy response profiles and caudate and accumbens dopamine dynamics.

Authors:  R Kuczenski; D S Segal; M L Aizenstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Serotonergic mechanisms involved in the discriminative stimulus, reinforcing and subjective effects of cocaine.

Authors:  S L Walsh; K A Cunningham
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Relationship between subjective effects of cocaine and dopamine transporter occupancy.

Authors:  N D Volkow; G J Wang; M W Fischman; R W Foltin; J S Fowler; N N Abumrad; S Vitkun; J Logan; S J Gatley; N Pappas; R Hitzemann; C E Shea
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-04-24       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Behavioral and neurochemical effects of acute and daily cocaine administration in rats.

Authors:  P W Kalivas; P Duffy; L A DuMars; C Skinner
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 6.  Dopamine and drug addiction: the nucleus accumbens shell connection.

Authors:  Gaetano Di Chiara; Valentina Bassareo; Sandro Fenu; Maria Antonietta De Luca; Liliana Spina; Cristina Cadoni; Elio Acquas; Ezio Carboni; Valentina Valentini; Daniele Lecca
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.250

7.  Cocaine disposition in the brain after continuous or intermittent treatment and locomotor stimulation in mice.

Authors:  M E Reith; M Benuck; A Lajtha
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.030

8.  Dopamine in the nucleus accumbens during cocaine self-administration as studied by in vivo microdialysis.

Authors:  H O Pettit; J B Justice
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.533

9.  Naloxone reduces the neurochemical and behavioral effects of amphetamine but not those of cocaine.

Authors:  C A Schad; J B Justice; S G Holtzman
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1995-02-24       Impact factor: 4.432

10.  Hippocampus norepinephrine, caudate dopamine and serotonin, and behavioral responses to the stereoisomers of amphetamine and methamphetamine.

Authors:  R Kuczenski; D S Segal; A K Cho; W Melega
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  25 in total

1.  Nicotine- and cocaine-triggered methamphetamine reinstatement in female and male Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Steven T Pittenger; Shinnyi Chou; Scott T Barrett; Isabella Catalano; Maxwell Lydiatt; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.533

2.  Preference for distinct functional conformations of the dopamine transporter alters the relationship between subjective effects of cocaine and stimulation of mesolimbic dopamine.

Authors:  Stephen J Kohut; Takato Hiranita; Soo-Kyung Hong; Aaron L Ebbs; Valeria Tronci; Jennifer Green; Linda Garcés-Ramírez; Lauren E Chun; Maddalena Mereu; Amy H Newman; Jonathan L Katz; Gianluigi Tanda
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 3.  Human Drug Discrimination: Elucidating the Neuropharmacology of Commonly Abused Illicit Drugs.

Authors:  B Levi Bolin; Joseph L Alcorn; Anna R Reynolds; Joshua A Lile; William W Stoops; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018

4.  N-Methyl-d-aspartate receptor co-agonist availability affects behavioral and neurochemical responses to cocaine: insights into comorbid schizophrenia and substance abuse.

Authors:  Matthew D Puhl; Rajeev I Desai; Shunsuke Takagi; Kendall T Presti; Michelle R Doyle; Rachel J Donahue; Samantha M Landino; Jack Bergman; William A Carlezon; Joseph T Coyle
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 4.280

5.  Behavioral phenotyping and dopamine dynamics in mice with conditional deletion of the glutamate transporter GLT-1 in neurons: resistance to the acute locomotor effects of amphetamine.

Authors:  Kathryn D Fischer; Alex C W Houston; Rajeev I Desai; Michelle R Doyle; Jack Bergman; Maha Mian; Rebekah Mannix; David L Sulzer; Se Joon Choi; Eugene V Mosharov; Nathaniel W Hodgson; Anita Bechtholt; Klaus A Miczek; Paul A Rosenberg
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (PKPD) Analysis with Drug Discrimination.

Authors:  S Stevens Negus; Matthew L Banks
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018

Review 7.  Drug induced increases in CNS dopamine alter monocyte, macrophage and T cell functions: implications for HAND.

Authors:  Peter J Gaskill; Tina M Calderon; Jacqueline S Coley; Joan W Berman
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Relations between stimulation of mesolimbic dopamine and place conditioning in rats produced by cocaine or drugs that are tolerant to dopamine transporter conformational change.

Authors:  Gianluigi Tanda; Su Min Li; Maddalena Mereu; Alexandra M Thomas; Aaron L Ebbs; Lauren E Chun; Valeria Tronci; Jennifer L Green; Mu-Fa Zou; Theresa A Kopajtic; Amy Hauck Newman; Jonathan L Katz
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Relationship between discriminative stimulus effects and plasma methamphetamine and amphetamine levels of intramuscular methamphetamine in male rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Matthew L Banks; Douglas A Smith; David F Kisor; Justin L Poklis
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  Distribution and pharmacokinetics of methamphetamine in the human body: clinical implications.

Authors:  Nora D Volkow; Joanna S Fowler; Gene-Jack Wang; Elena Shumay; Frank Telang; Peter K Thanos; David Alexoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.