Literature DB >> 20189924

Development of the Fertility and Cancer Project: an Internet approach to help young cancer survivors.

Karen Meneses1, Patrick McNees, Andres Azuero, Angela Jukkala.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVES: To describe the development of the Fertility and Cancer Project (FCP), an Internet approach to supplement information about fertility; describe FCP study participants' characteristics, fertility, cancer knowledge, and Internet use; and assess perceived information and support from the oncology team.
DESIGN: Descriptive.
SETTING: Internet, international. SAMPLE: 106 young survivors of breast cancer from eight countries.
METHODS: FCP content was developed from the literature and interviews with breast cancer survivors, oncology professionals, and young women without cancer who were having fertility problems. Participants learned about the FCP through advocacy groups, cancer care providers, and Web searches. After enrollment, they completed five surveys: sociodemographic, breast cancer and health status, knowledge of fertility, Internet use, and the Medical Outcomes Study-Social Support Survey. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Sociodemographics, breast cancer, health status, fertility knowledge, Internet use, and social support.
FINDINGS: Prior to diagnosis, most survivors had no fertility concerns, but more than 14% reported fertility problems. Following breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, 23 reported fertility problems. About half reported receiving little information about fertility options from the oncology team and were referred to a reproductive endocrinologist. Internet use to obtain support and health information was common. Most reported frequent computer use and Internet access in their homes. Participants were most knowledgeable of the general and treatment-related factors that could affect fertility; they were least knowledgeable of infertility treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Results provide preliminary evidence about the demographic, cancer treatment, and support characteristics of young survivors of breast cancer who seek online information about fertility. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The Internet is a promising format for engaging young cancer survivors who seek information about fertility and cancer. Future studies can evaluate FCP effectiveness in delivering education and support interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20189924     DOI: 10.1188/10.ONF.191-197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum        ISSN: 0190-535X            Impact factor:   2.172


  16 in total

Review 1.  Breast cancer and fertility preservation.

Authors:  S Samuel Kim; Jennifer Klemp; Carol Fabian
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  A pilot study to examine patient awareness and provider discussion of the impact of cancer treatment on fertility in a registry-based sample of African American women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Susan T Vadaparampil; Juliette Christie; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Patrice Fleming; Caitlin Stowe; Bethanne Bower; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Psychosocial challenges and hormonal treatment in gender diverse children and adolescents. A narrative review.

Authors:  Laura Baetens; Karlien Dhondt
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 2.896

4.  On-Site Fertility Preservation Services for Adolescents and Young Adults in a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Authors:  Mary Peavey; Sara Arian; William Gibbons; Karen Lu; David Gershenson; Terri Woodard
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.223

5.  Knowledge and Beliefs About Oncofertility and Associations with Quality of Life Among Adolescent and Young Adult Survivors of Pediatric Cancer.

Authors:  Andrea C Johnson; Darren Mays; Kathryn Rehberg; Aziza Shad; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.223

6.  Fertility-related experiences after breast cancer diagnosis in the Sister and Two Sister Studies.

Authors:  Leah Hawkins Bressler; Jennifer E Mersereau; Chelsea Anderson; Juan L Rodriguez; M Elizabeth Hodgson; Clarice R Weinberg; Dale P Sandler; Hazel B Nichols
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  The current fertility preservation consultation model: are we adequately informing cancer patients of their options?

Authors:  Ursula Balthazar; Allison M Deal; Marc A Fritz; Laxmi A Kondapalli; Ja Yeon Kim; Jennifer E Mersereau
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 8.  Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update.

Authors:  Alison W Loren; Pamela B Mangu; Lindsay Nohr Beck; Lawrence Brennan; Anthony J Magdalinski; Ann H Partridge; Gwendolyn Quinn; W Hamish Wallace; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Self-advocacy and cancer: a concept analysis.

Authors:  Teresa L Hagan; Heidi S Donovan
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.187

10.  Web-based self-management for young cancer survivors: consideration of user requirements and barriers to implementation.

Authors:  Louise Moody; Andrew Turner; Jane Osmond; Louise Hooker; Joanna Kosmala-Anderson; Lynn Batehup
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 4.442

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.