Literature DB >> 20189608

Pulsatile intermittent intravenous insulin therapy for attenuation of retinopathy and nephropathy in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Larry A Weinrauch1, Jennifer Sun, Ray E Gleason, Guenther H Boden, R H Creech, George Dailey, Frank P Kennedy, Matthew R Weir, John A D'Elia.   

Abstract

Many hormones are secreted in a pulsatile fashion that is more efficient than continuous secretion when tested in vivo. A trial of multiple daily insulin doses with or without the addition of weekly pulsatile insulin infusion therapy was designed to determine if deterioration of renal and retinal function could be blunted. Sixty-five study subjects were evaluated prospectively in 7 centers. Thirty-six patients were randomly allocated to the infusion group and 29 to the standard therapy group. Mean serum creatinine was 1.6 mg/dL in both groups. Subjects were excluded if clearance was less than 30 mL/min. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to age, duration of diabetes, sex distribution, glycohemoglobin, blood pressure, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use, proteinuria, or baseline diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity level (all eyes exhibited DR; 8 were deemed technically not amenable to evaluation). Progression of DR was noted in 31.6% of 57 patients (32.3% treated, 30.8% control; P = 1.0) with both eyes evaluable. For patients with 12 or more months of follow-up, 27.9% of 43 patients demonstrated progression of DR (32.0% treated, 22.2% control; P = .57). There were no significant differences between study groups with respect to progression or marked progression, nor was there any influence of duration of follow-up. Progression of DR was noted in 18.8% of 122 eyes that could be adequately evaluated (17.9% of 67 treated, 20% of 55 controls; P = .39). Serum creatinine increased to 1.7 mg/dL in the treatment group and to 1.9 mg/dL in the control group (P = .03). Statistically significant preservation of renal function by pulsatile insulin infusion was not matched by a statistically significant prevention of DR progression compared with standard diabetes care. Inadequate statistical power or duration of the study, or lack of further benefit of pulsatile insulin infusion on the retina in the presence of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition may be responsible.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20189608     DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2010.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Metabolism        ISSN: 0026-0495            Impact factor:   8.694


  4 in total

1.  Diabetic microvascular complications: possible targets for improved macrovascular outcomes.

Authors:  John A D'Elia; George Bayliss; Bijan Roshan; Manish Maski; Ray E Gleason; Larry A Weinrauch
Journal:  Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis       Date:  2010-12-22

Review 2.  Effects of Periodic Intensive Insulin Therapy: An Updated Review.

Authors:  Shu Dong; Hien Lau; Cody Chavarria; Michael Alexander; Allison Cimler; John P Elliott; Sandra Escovar; Jack Lewin; James Novak; Jonathan R T Lakey
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2019-04-30

3.  Periodic Intensive Insulin Therapy Remains Experimental.

Authors:  Amy Chang; Athena Philis-Tsimikas
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2019-08-20

Review 4.  Insulin and glucose-lowering agents for treating people with diabetes and chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Clement Lo; Tadashi Toyama; Ying Wang; Jin Lin; Yoichiro Hirakawa; Min Jun; Alan Cass; Carmel M Hawley; Helen Pilmore; Sunil V Badve; Vlado Perkovic; Sophia Zoungas
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.