BACKGROUND: The presence of J waves on ECGs is related to idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (VF). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the pathophysiology of J waves by assessing risk markers that reflect electrophysiologic abnormalities. METHODS: The study enrolled 22 idiopathic VF patients (17 men and 5 women; mean age 36 +/- 13 years). Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of J waves. The following risk stratifiers were assessed: late potentials (LPs; depolarization abnormality marker) for 24 hours using a newly developed signal-averaging system, and T-wave alternans and QT dispersion (repolarization abnormality markers). Frequency-domain heart rate variability (HRV), which reflects autonomic modulation, also was assessed. The results were compared to those of 30 control subjects with J waves and 30 with no J wave, matched for age and gender to the idiopathic VF patients. RESULTS: J waves were present in 7 (32%) idiopathic VF patients. The incidence of LP in the idiopathic VF J-wave group was higher than in the idiopathic VF non-J-wave group (86% vs 27%, P = .02). In contrast, repolarization abnormality markers did not differ between the two groups. In the idiopathic VF J-wave group, dynamic changes in LP parameters (fQRS, RMS(40), LAS(40)) were observed and were pronounced at nighttime; this was not the case in the idiopathic VF non-J-wave group and the control J-wave group. High-frequency components (vagal tone index) on frequency-domain HRV analysis were associated with J waves in idiopathic VF patients (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Idiopathic VF patients with J waves had a high incidence of LP showing circadian variation with night ascendancy. J waves may be more closely associated with depolarization abnormality and autonomic modulation than with repolarization abnormality. Copyright 2010 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: The presence of J waves on ECGs is related to idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (VF). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the pathophysiology of J waves by assessing risk markers that reflect electrophysiologic abnormalities. METHODS: The study enrolled 22 idiopathic VFpatients (17 men and 5 women; mean age 36 +/- 13 years). Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of J waves. The following risk stratifiers were assessed: late potentials (LPs; depolarization abnormality marker) for 24 hours using a newly developed signal-averaging system, and T-wave alternans and QT dispersion (repolarization abnormality markers). Frequency-domain heart rate variability (HRV), which reflects autonomic modulation, also was assessed. The results were compared to those of 30 control subjects with J waves and 30 with no J wave, matched for age and gender to the idiopathic VFpatients. RESULTS: J waves were present in 7 (32%) idiopathic VFpatients. The incidence of LP in the idiopathic VF J-wave group was higher than in the idiopathic VF non-J-wave group (86% vs 27%, P = .02). In contrast, repolarization abnormality markers did not differ between the two groups. In the idiopathic VF J-wave group, dynamic changes in LP parameters (fQRS, RMS(40), LAS(40)) were observed and were pronounced at nighttime; this was not the case in the idiopathic VF non-J-wave group and the control J-wave group. High-frequency components (vagal tone index) on frequency-domain HRV analysis were associated with J waves in idiopathic VFpatients (P < .05). CONCLUSION:Idiopathic VFpatients with J waves had a high incidence of LP showing circadian variation with night ascendancy. J waves may be more closely associated with depolarization abnormality and autonomic modulation than with repolarization abnormality. Copyright 2010 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: K G Madhu; Vijo George; T G Binu; R Ranjith; Subair Kunju; R Baiju; K S Mohanan; R Jayaram; V V Radhakrishnan Journal: Heart Asia Date: 2014-12-08