Literature DB >> 20189242

The effect of static magnetic fields and tat peptides on cellular and nuclear uptake of magnetic nanoparticles.

Carol-Anne M Smith1, Jesus de la Fuente, Beatriz Pelaz, Edward P Furlani, Margaret Mullin, Catherine C Berry.   

Abstract

Magnetic nanoparticles are widely used in bioapplications such as imaging (MRI), targeted delivery (drugs/genes) and cell transfection (magnetofection). Historically, the impermeable nature of both the plasma and nuclear membranes hinder potential. Researchers combat this by developing techniques to enhance cellular and nuclear uptake. Two current popular methods are using external magnetic fields to remotely control particle direction or functionalising the nanoparticles with a cell penetrating peptide (e.g. tat); both of which facilitate cell entry. This paper compares the success of both methods in terms of nanoparticle uptake, analysing the type of magnetic forces the particles experience, and determines gross cell response in terms of morphology and structure and changes at the gene level via microarray analysis. Results indicated that both methods enhanced uptake via a caveolin dependent manner, with tat peptide being the more efficient and achieving nuclear uptake. On comparison to control cells, many groups of gene changes were observed in response to the particles. Importantly, the magnetic field also caused many change in gene expression, regardless of the nanoparticles, and appeared to cause F-actin alignment in the cells. Results suggest that static fields should be modelled and analysed prior to application in culture as cells clearly respond appropriately. Furthermore, the use of cell penetrating peptides may prove more beneficial in terms of enhancing uptake and maintaining cell homeostasis than a magnetic field. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20189242     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  12 in total

1.  A model for predicting field-directed particle transport in the magnetofection process.

Authors:  Edward P Furlani; Xiaozheng Xue
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Physically facilitating drug-delivery systems.

Authors:  Jorge I Rodriguez-Devora; Sunny Ambure; Zhi-Dong Shi; Yuyu Yuan; Wei Sun; Tao Xui
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2012-01

Review 3.  Image-guided dendritic cell-based vaccine immunotherapy in murine carcinoma models.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Chong Sun; Sijia Wang; Na Shang; Matteo Figini; Quanhong Ma; Shanzhi Gu; Daniele Procissi; Vahid Yaghmai; Guoxin Li; Andrew Larson; Zhuoli Zhang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Multi-ligand poly(L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles inhibit activation of endothelial cells.

Authors:  Hao Xu; Soujanya Kona; Lee-Chun Su; Yi-Ting Tsai; Jing-Fei Dong; Emmanouil S Brilakis; Liping Tang; Subhash Banerjee; Kytai T Nguyen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Bacterial magnetic particles as a novel and efficient gene vaccine delivery system.

Authors:  Y-S Tang; D Wang; C Zhou; W Ma; Y-Q Zhang; B Liu; S Zhang
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 5.250

6.  Magnetic nanoparticles as targeted delivery systems in oncology.

Authors:  Sara Prijic; Gregor Sersa
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 7.  Cell-penetrating peptides and their analogues as novel nanocarriers for drug delivery.

Authors:  Samira Jafari; Solmaz Maleki Dizaj; Khosro Adibkia
Journal:  Bioimpacts       Date:  2015-04-22

8.  Evaluation of oxidative response and tissular damage in rat lungs exposed to silica-coated gold nanoparticles under static magnetic fields.

Authors:  Soumaya Ferchichi; Hamdi Trabelsi; Inès Azzouz; Amel Hanini; Ahmed Rejeb; Olfa Tebourbi; Mohsen Sakly; Hafedh Abdelmelek
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2016-06-08

9.  External magnetic field promotes homing of magnetized stem cells following subcutaneous injection.

Authors:  Yu Meng; Changzhen Shi; Bo Hu; Jian Gong; Xing Zhong; Xueyin Lin; Xinju Zhang; Jun Liu; Cong Liu; Hao Xu
Journal:  BMC Cell Biol       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Elucidating the function of penetratin and a static magnetic field in cellular uptake of magnetic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Suman Chaudhary; Carol Anne Smith; Pablo Del Pino; Jesus M de la Fuente; Margaret Mullin; Andrew Hursthouse; David Stirling; Catherine C Berry
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2013-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.