Literature DB >> 20188382

Barriers to movement: Modelling energetic costs of avoiding marine wind farms amongst breeding seabirds.

Elizabeth A Masden1, Daniel T Haydon, Anthony D Fox, Robert W Furness.   

Abstract

Proposals for wind farms in areas of known importance for breeding seabirds highlight the need to understand the impacts of these structures. Using an energetic modelling approach, we examine the effects of wind farms as barriers to movement on seabirds of differing morphology. Additional costs, expressed in relation to typical daily energetic expenditures, were highest per unit flight for seabirds with high wing loadings, such as cormorants. Taking species-specific differences into account, costs were relatively higher in terns, due to the high daily frequency of foraging flights. For all species, costs of extra flight to avoid a wind farm appear much less than those imposed by low food abundance or adverse weather, although such costs will be additive to these. We conclude that adopting a species-specific approach is essential when assessing the impacts of wind farms on breeding seabird populations, to fully anticipate the effects of avoidance flights. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20188382     DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull        ISSN: 0025-326X            Impact factor:   5.553


  7 in total

1.  Assessing the impact of marine wind farms on birds through movement modelling.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Masden; Richard Reeve; Mark Desholm; Anthony D Fox; Robert W Furness; Daniel T Haydon
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Coupling instantaneous energy-budget models and behavioural mode analysis to estimate optimal foraging strategy: an example with wandering albatrosses.

Authors:  Maite Louzao; Thorsten Wiegand; Frederic Bartumeus; Henri Weimerskirch
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.600

Review 3.  Assessing environmental impacts of offshore wind farms: lessons learned and recommendations for the future.

Authors:  Helen Bailey; Kate L Brookes; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Aquat Biosyst       Date:  2014-09-14

4.  Context-dependent variability in the predicted daily energetic costs of disturbance for blue whales.

Authors:  Enrico Pirotta; Cormac G Booth; David E Cade; John Calambokidis; Daniel P Costa; James A Fahlbusch; Ari S Friedlaender; Jeremy A Goldbogen; John Harwood; Elliott L Hazen; Leslie New; Brandon L Southall
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 3.079

5.  Using seabird habitat modeling to inform marine spatial planning in central California's National Marine Sanctuaries.

Authors:  Jennifer McGowan; Ellen Hines; Meredith Elliott; Julie Howar; Andrea Dransfield; Nadav Nur; Jaime Jahncke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Taking a trip to the shelf: Behavioral decisions are mediated by the proximity to foraging habitats in the black-legged kittiwake.

Authors:  Signe Christensen-Dalsgaard; Roel May; Svein-Håkon Lorentsen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-12-10       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Responses of two marine top predators to an offshore wind farm.

Authors:  Gillian C Vallejo; Kate Grellier; Emily J Nelson; Ross M McGregor; Sarah J Canning; Fiona M Caryl; Nancy McLean
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.912

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.