Literature DB >> 20188027

Dominance, body size and internal relatedness influence male reproductive success in eastern grey kangaroos (Macropus giganteus).

Emily J Miller1, Mark D B Eldridge, Desmond W Cooper, Catherine A Herbert.   

Abstract

Knowledge of the determinants of reproductive success is essential for understanding the adaptive significance of particular traits. The present study examined whether particular behavioural, morphological, physiological or genetic traits were correlated with male dominance and reproductive success using three semi-free-ranging captive populations (n = 98) of the eastern grey kangaroo (Macropus giganteus). The morphological traits measured included bodyweight, head, forearm, tail, pes and leg length, forearm and bicep circumference, and testis size. Blood samples were collected to determine serum testosterone concentrations. All individuals were typed for 10 microsatellite loci and paternity determined for each pouch young. To determine the influence of relatedness and genetic diversity on male reproductive success, internal relatedness, standardised heterozygosity and mean d(2) were calculated. Dominant males sired a significantly higher proportion of offspring than smaller, lower-ranked males and had higher testosterone concentrations. Males that sired offspring were significantly heavier and had larger body size. Sires were significantly more heterozygous and genetically dissimilar to breeding females than non-sires. Despite the wealth of knowledge on the social organisation of kangaroos, this is the first study to assign parentage and male reproductive success using molecular evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20188027     DOI: 10.1071/RD09061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Fertil Dev        ISSN: 1031-3613            Impact factor:   2.311


  9 in total

1.  Faster reproductive rates trade off against offspring growth in wild chimpanzees.

Authors:  Melissa Emery Thompson; Martin N Muller; Kris Sabbi; Zarin P Machanda; Emily Otali; Richard W Wrangham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Interspecific and geographic variation in the diets of sympatric carnivores: dingoes/wild dogs and red foxes in south-eastern Australia.

Authors:  Naomi E Davis; David M Forsyth; Barbara Triggs; Charlie Pascoe; Joe Benshemesh; Alan Robley; Jenny Lawrence; Euan G Ritchie; Dale G Nimmo; Lindy F Lumsden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Mother-offspring distances reflect sex differences in fine-scale genetic structure of eastern grey kangaroos.

Authors:  Wendy J King; Dany Garant; Marco Festa-Bianchet
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Extensive genetic differentiation detected within a model marsupial, the tammar wallaby (Notamacropus eugenii).

Authors:  Mark D B Eldridge; Emily J Miller; Linda E Neaves; Kyall R Zenger; Catherine A Herbert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The genetic relatedness of a peri-urban population of eastern grey kangaroos.

Authors:  Jai M Green-Barber; Julie M Old
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-12-04

6.  Understanding Historical Demographic Processes to Inform Contemporary Conservation of an Arid zone Specialist: The Yellow-Footed Rock-Wallaby.

Authors:  Sally Potter; Linda E Neaves; Mark Lethbridge; Mark D B Eldridge
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.096

7.  Male morphological traits are heritable but do not predict reproductive success in a sexually-dimorphic primate.

Authors:  Clare M Kimock; Constance Dubuc; Lauren J N Brent; James P Higham
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Female fertile phase synchrony, and male mating and reproductive skew, in the crested macaque.

Authors:  James P Higham; Michael Heistermann; Muhammad Agil; Dyah Perwitasari-Farajallah; Anja Widdig; Antje Engelhardt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  DomArchive: a century of published dominance data.

Authors:  Eli D Strauss; Alex R DeCasien; Gabriela Galindo; Elizabeth A Hobson; Daizaburo Shizuka; James P Curley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.237

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.