Literature DB >> 20186536

Evaluation of potential breath biomarkers for active smoking: assessment of smoking habits.

Monica Alonso1, Mar Castellanos, Juan M Sanchez.   

Abstract

Different compounds have been reported as biomarkers of a smoking habit, but, to date, there is no appropriate biomarker for tobacco-related exposure because the proposed chemicals seem to be nonspecific or they are only appropriate for short-term exposure. Moreover, conventional sampling methodologies require an invasive method because blood or urine samples are required. The use of a microtrap system coupled to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis has been found to be very effective for the noninvasive analysis of volatile organic compounds in breath samples. The levels of benzene, 2,5-dimethylfuran, toluene, o-xylene, and m- p-xylene have been analyzed in breath samples obtained from 204 volunteers (100 smokers, 104 nonsmokers; 147 females, 57 males; ages 16 to 53 years). 2,5-Dimethylfuran was always below the limit of detection (0.005 ppbv) in the nonsmoker population and always detected in smokers independently of the smoking habits. Benzene was only an effective biomarker for medium and heavy smokers, and its level was affected by smoking habits. Regarding the levels of xylenes and toluene, they were only different in heavy smokers and after short-term exposure. The results obtained suggest that 2,5-dimethylfuran is a specific breath biomarker of smoking status independently of the smoking habits (e.g., short- and long-term exposure, light and heavy consumption), and so this compound might be useful as a biomarker of smoking exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20186536     DOI: 10.1007/s00216-010-3524-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.142


  3 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers of exposure to new and emerging tobacco delivery products.

Authors:  Suzaynn F Schick; Benjamin C Blount; Peyton Jacob; Najat A Saliba; John T Bernert; Ahmad El Hellani; Peter Jatlow; R Steven Pappas; Lanqing Wang; Jonathan Foulds; Arunava Ghosh; Stephen S Hecht; John C Gomez; Jessica R Martin; Clementina Mesaros; Sanjay Srivastava; Gideon St Helen; Robert Tarran; Pawel K Lorkiewicz; Ian A Blair; Heather L Kimmel; Claire M Doerschuk; Neal L Benowitz; Aruni Bhatnagar
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 5.464

2.  FEV manoeuvre induced changes in breath VOC compositions: an unconventional view on lung function tests.

Authors:  Pritam Sukul; Jochen K Schubert; Peter Oertel; Svend Kamysek; Khushman Taunk; Phillip Trefz; Wolfram Miekisch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Exhaled breath analysis: a review of 'breath-taking' methods for off-line analysis.

Authors:  Oluwasola Lawal; Waqar M Ahmed; Tamara M E Nijsen; Royston Goodacre; Stephen J Fowler
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 4.290

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.