Literature DB >> 20186140

Dietary restraint and control over "wanting" following consumption of "forbidden" food.

Sofie G Lemmens1, Jurriaan M Born, Femke Rutters, Paul F Schoffelen, Loek Wouters, Margriet S Westerterp-Plantenga.   

Abstract

Eating behavior can be influenced by the rewarding value of food, i.e., "liking" and "wanting." The objective of this study was to assess in normal-weight dietary restrained (NR) vs. unrestrained (NU) eaters how rewarding value of food is affected by satiety, and by eating a nonhealthy perceived, dessert-specific food vs. a healthy perceived, neutral food (chocolate mousse vs. cottage cheese). Subjects (24NR age = 25.0 ± 8.2 years, BMI = 22.3 ± 2.1 kg/m(2); 26NU age = 24.8 ± 8.0 years, BMI = 22.1 ± 1.7 kg/m(2)) came to the university twice, fasted (randomized crossover design). Per test-session "liking" and "wanting" for 72 items divided in six categories (bread, filling, drinks, dessert, sweets, stationery (placebo)) was measured, before and after consumption of chocolate mousse/cottage cheese, matched for energy content (5.6 kJ/g) and individual daily energy requirements (10%). Chocolate mousse was liked more than cottage cheese (P < 0.05). After consumption of chocolate mousse or cottage cheese, appetite and "liking" vs. placebo were decreased in NR and NU (P < 0.03), whereas "wanting" was only decreased in NR vs. NU (P ≤ 0.01). In NR vs. NU "wanting" was specifically decreased after chocolate mousse vs. cottage cheese; this decrease concerned especially "wanting" for bread and filling (P < 0.05). To conclude, despite similar decreases in appetite and "liking" after a meal in NR and NU, NR decrease "wanting" in contrast to NU. NR decrease "wanting" specifically for a nonhealthy perceived, "delicious," dessert-specific food vs. a nutritional identical, yet healthy perceived, slightly less "delicious," "neutral" food. A healthy perceived food may thus impose greater risk for control of energy intake in NR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20186140     DOI: 10.1038/oby.2010.36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)        ISSN: 1930-7381            Impact factor:   5.002


  3 in total

1.  Wanting and liking: Separable components in problematic eating behavior?

Authors:  Sarah E Polk; Erica M Schulte; Celina R Furman; Ashley N Gearhardt
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 2.  Set points, settling points and some alternative models: theoretical options to understand how genes and environments combine to regulate body adiposity.

Authors:  John R Speakman; David A Levitsky; David B Allison; Molly S Bray; John M de Castro; Deborah J Clegg; John C Clapham; Abdul G Dulloo; Laurence Gruer; Sally Haw; Johannes Hebebrand; Marion M Hetherington; Susanne Higgs; Susan A Jebb; Ruth J F Loos; Simon Luckman; Amy Luke; Vidya Mohammed-Ali; Stephen O'Rahilly; Mark Pereira; Louis Perusse; Tom N Robinson; Barbara Rolls; Michael E Symonds; Margriet S Westerterp-Plantenga
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.758

3.  The Choice of Bread: The Association between Consumers' Awareness of Dietary Fiber and Declared Intentions to Eat.

Authors:  Marzena Jezewska-Zychowicz; Maria Królak
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 5.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.