Literature DB >> 20185789

Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians: periprocedural stroke risk predictor analysis from the multicenter Carotid ACCULINK/ACCUNET Post Approval Trial to Uncover Rare Events (CAPTURE 2) clinical trial.

Seemant Chaturvedi1, Jon S Matsumura, William Gray, Chuanbo Xu, Patrick Verta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Carotid ACCULINK/ACCUNET Post Approval Trial to Uncover Rare Events (CAPTURE 2) is an ongoing prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter clinical trial enrolling patients undergoing carotid artery stenting. The aim of this analysis is to identify risk predictors for periprocedural stroke in patients > or = 80 years old.
METHODS: Symptomatic patients with > or = 50% stenosis and asymptomatic patients with > or = 80% stenosis were enrolled. Patients' neurological status was assessed by an independent neurologist before as well as 24 hours and 30 days postprocedure. All strokes and suspected strokes were adjudicated by an independent committee. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify baseline demographic, lesion, procedural, or comorbidity parameters associated with outcomes in patients > or = 80 years of age.
RESULTS: As of January 10, 2009, 5297 patients underwent carotid artery stenting in 186 US CAPTURE 2 clinical centers and 1166 were > or = 80 years old. Octogenarians were similar to nonoctogenarians in terms of gender and symptomatic status but had fewer of certain risk factors (prior myocardial infarction or carotid endarterectomy, diabetes, smoking history) and more cardiac arrhythmia and renal insufficiency. For the overall cohort, death/stroke rate was 3.3%; stroke rate was 2.7% (0.8% major, 1.9% minor). Death/stroke rates were significantly higher for octogenarians than nonoctogenarians (4.5% versus 3.0%) as were stroke rates (3.8% versus 2.4%). Symptomatic status, embolic protection device dwell time, and lesion length were risk predictors for periprocedural stroke in octogenarians.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients > or = 80 years old have higher periprocedural event rates than nonoctogenarians. Age, symptomatic status, and lesion length should be considered when identifying appropriate candidates for the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20185789     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.569426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  14 in total

1.  Demographic and Technical Risk Factors of 30-Day Stroke, Myocardial Infarction, and/or Death in Standard- and High-Risk Patients Who Underwent Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting.

Authors:  Afshin Borhani Haghighi; Samaneh Yousefi; Ehsan Bahramali; Safoora Kokabi; Seyed Taghi Heydari; Abdolhamid Shariat; Alireza Nikseresht; Nahid Ashjazadeh; Sadegh Izadi; Peyman Petramfar; Maryam Poursadegh; Abbas Rahimi Jaberi; Sajjad Emami; Hamid Agheli; Reza Nemati; Ehsan Yaghoubi; Mohammad Hosein Abdi; Majid Panahandeh; Moslem Heydari; Anahid Safari; Marziyeh Basir; Salvador Cruz-Flores; Randal Edgell
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2015-07

2.  Age and outcomes after carotid stenting and endarterectomy: the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial.

Authors:  Jenifer H Voeks; George Howard; Gary S Roubin; Mahmoud B Malas; David J Cohen; W Charles Sternbergh; Herbert D Aronow; Mark K Eskandari; Alice J Sheffet; Brajesh K Lal; James F Meschia; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 3.  Ischemic stroke in the elderly: an overview of evidence.

Authors:  Ruo-Li Chen; Joyce S Balami; Margaret M Esiri; Liang-Kung Chen; Alastair M Buchan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 42.937

4.  Factors Associated with Increased Rates of Post-procedural Stroke or Death following Carotid Artery Stent Placement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Muhib Khan; Adnan I Qureshi
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2014-05

5.  Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Vascular Registry evaluation of comparative effectiveness of carotid revascularization procedures stratified by Medicare age.

Authors:  Jeffrey Jim; Brian G Rubin; Joseph J Ricotta; Christopher T Kenwood; Flora S Siami; Gregorio A Sicard
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Anatomical and technical predictors of perioperative clinical outcomes after carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Ali F AbuRahma; Trevor DerDerian; Nizar Hariri; Elliot Adams; Joseph AbuRahma; L Scott Dean; Aravinda Nanjundappa; Patrick A Stone
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 7.  Age and gender disparities in the risk of carotid revascularization procedures.

Authors:  Sotirios Giannopoulos; Aristeidis H Katsanos; Spyros N Vasdekis; Efstathios Boviatsis; Konstantinos Iota Voumvourakis; Georgios Tsivgoulis
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 3.307

8.  Carotid stenting in a nonagenarian patient with symptomatic carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Ranjan Shetty K; Vivek G; Manoj K Gupta; Krishananda Nayak; Umesh Pai; Lorraine Dias; Kushal Naha; Raviraj Acharya
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2012-10-31

Review 9.  Trials and Frontiers in Carotid Endarterectomy and Stenting.

Authors:  Douglas W Jones; Thomas G Brott; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Comparison of carotid endarterectomy and stenting in real world practice using a regional quality improvement registry.

Authors:  Brian W Nolan; Randall R De Martino; Philip P Goodney; Andres Schanzer; David H Stone; David Butzel; Christopher J Kwolek; Jack L Cronenwett
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 4.268

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.