BACKGROUND: Stress myocyte biomarkers are used prognostically in patients with cardiovascular disease. We examined associations between amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), midregional pro-A-type natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), and midregional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) concentrations and cardiac chamber volumes in chest pain patients without heart failure by use of computed tomography (CT). METHODS: At the time of 64-slice CT scan, we acquired plasma and serum samples for these biomarkers from 346 patients [mean (SD) age 53 (12) years, 65% men]. Left atrial volume (LAV) and left ventricular volumes at end-diastole (LVEDV) and end-systole (LVESV) were measured and indexed to body surface area (LAVI, LVEDI, LVESI). RESULTS: Concentrations of both natriuretic peptides were correlated with LAV and LAVI (r = 0.19-0.32, all P <or= 0.0005) and MR-proADM with LV volumes and indices (r = -0.14 to -0.21, all P <or= 0.01). NT-proBNP and MR-proANP concentrations were higher in the top quartiles of patients than the lowest quartiles using LAV and LAVI, whereas MR-proADM concentrations were lower in the top quartiles of LV measures. In adjusted analyses, patients had 2- to 4-fold increased risk of LA enlargement for every incremental increase in log(10)NT-proBNP [LAV odds ratio (OR) 2.4, P = 0.03; LAVI OR 4.0, P = 0.003] and 10- to 13-fold increased risk of LA enlargement for every incremental increase in log(10)MR-proANP (LAV OR 10.7, P = 0.009; LAVI OR 13.1, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In patients without heart failure, both NT-proBNP and MR-proANP concentrations are independently associated with LA enlargement, whereas MR-proADM concentrations are correlated with LV volumes. This may partially explain the well-recognized value of natriuretic peptides for use in risk stratification.
BACKGROUND: Stress myocyte biomarkers are used prognostically in patients with cardiovascular disease. We examined associations between amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), midregional pro-A-type natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), and midregional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) concentrations and cardiac chamber volumes in chest painpatients without heart failure by use of computed tomography (CT). METHODS: At the time of 64-slice CT scan, we acquired plasma and serum samples for these biomarkers from 346 patients [mean (SD) age 53 (12) years, 65% men]. Left atrial volume (LAV) and left ventricular volumes at end-diastole (LVEDV) and end-systole (LVESV) were measured and indexed to body surface area (LAVI, LVEDI, LVESI). RESULTS: Concentrations of both natriuretic peptides were correlated with LAV and LAVI (r = 0.19-0.32, all P <or= 0.0005) and MR-proADM with LV volumes and indices (r = -0.14 to -0.21, all P <or= 0.01). NT-proBNP and MR-proANP concentrations were higher in the top quartiles of patients than the lowest quartiles using LAV and LAVI, whereas MR-proADM concentrations were lower in the top quartiles of LV measures. In adjusted analyses, patients had 2- to 4-fold increased risk of LA enlargement for every incremental increase in log(10)NT-proBNP [LAV odds ratio (OR) 2.4, P = 0.03; LAVI OR 4.0, P = 0.003] and 10- to 13-fold increased risk of LA enlargement for every incremental increase in log(10)MR-proANP (LAV OR 10.7, P = 0.009; LAVI OR 13.1, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In patients without heart failure, both NT-proBNP and MR-proANP concentrations are independently associated with LA enlargement, whereas MR-proADM concentrations are correlated with LV volumes. This may partially explain the well-recognized value of natriuretic peptides for use in risk stratification.
Authors: Jacob E Moller; Graham S Hillis; Jae K Oh; James B Seward; Guy S Reeder; R Scott Wright; Seung W Park; Kent R Bailey; Patricia A Pellikka Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-04-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: A Lerman; R J Gibbons; R J Rodeheffer; K R Bailey; L J McKinley; D M Heublein; J C Burnett Journal: Lancet Date: 1993-05-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: M Potocki; T Breidthardt; T Reichlin; S Hartwiger; N G Morgenthaler; A Bergmann; M Noveanu; H Freidank; A B Taegtmeyer; K Wetzel; T Boldanova; C Stelzig; R Bingisser; M Christ; C Mueller Journal: J Intern Med Date: 2009-06-27 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Quynh A Truong; James Bayley; Udo Hoffmann; Fabian Bamberg; Christopher L Schlett; John T Nagurney; Wolfgang Koenig; James L Januzzi Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2012-05-21 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Marzena Zurek; Micha T Maeder; Martin H Brutsche; Adrian Lüthi; Raphael Twerenbold; Michael Freese; Hans Rickli; Christian Mueller Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2014-01-05 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Vanessa Xanthakis; Martin G Larson; Kai C Wollert; Jayashri Aragam; Susan Cheng; Jennifer Ho; Erin Coglianese; Daniel Levy; Wilson S Colucci; G Michael Felker; Emelia J Benjamin; James L Januzzi; Thomas J Wang; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2013-11-07 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Julia Ruhe; Christoph Waldeyer; Francisco Ojeda; Alev Altay; Renate B Schnabel; Sarina Schäfer; Karl J Lackner; Stefan Blankenberg; Tanja Zeller; Mahir Karakas Journal: Biomolecules Date: 2018-08-09
Authors: T Zeller; S Appelbaum; K Kuulasmaa; T Palosaari; S Blankenberg; P Jousilahti; V Salomaa; M Karakas Journal: J Intern Med Date: 2019-06-14 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Ahmet Bacaksiz; Mehmet Akif Vatankulu; Mehmet Kayrak; Hasan Huseyin Telli; Selim S Ayhan; Osman Sonmez; Ayse Alp; Sadik Buyukbas Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 2.365