BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recurrence of the original kidney disease after renal transplantation is an increasingly recognized cause of allograft loss. Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) is a common cause of proteinuria that may progress to ESRD. It is known that iMN may recur after kidney transplantation, causing proteinuria, allograft dysfunction, and allograft loss. Limited data regarding the frequency and treatment of recurrent iMN are available. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In this single-center study, all patients who had iMN and were receiving a first kidney transplant were included. We retrospectively assessed the incidence of biopsy-confirmed recurrent iMN and compared clinical characteristics of patients with and without recurrence. In addition, the effect of treatment with rituximab on proteinuria and renal allograft function in patients with recurrent iMN was examined RESULTS: The incidence of recurrent iMN was 44%, and recurrences occurred at a median time of 13.6 months after transplantation. Two patterns of recurrence were identified: Early and late. No predictors of recurrence or disease progression could be identified. Treatment with rituximab was effective in four of four patients in stabilizing or reducing proteinuria and stabilizing renal function. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence of iMN is common even in the era of modern immunosuppression. Rituximab seems to be a valuable treatment option for these patients, although lager studies are needed to confirm our data.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recurrence of the original kidney disease after renal transplantation is an increasingly recognized cause of allograft loss. Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) is a common cause of proteinuria that may progress to ESRD. It is known that iMN may recur after kidney transplantation, causing proteinuria, allograft dysfunction, and allograft loss. Limited data regarding the frequency and treatment of recurrent iMN are available. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In this single-center study, all patients who had iMN and were receiving a first kidney transplant were included. We retrospectively assessed the incidence of biopsy-confirmed recurrent iMN and compared clinical characteristics of patients with and without recurrence. In addition, the effect of treatment with rituximab on proteinuria and renal allograft function in patients with recurrent iMN was examined RESULTS: The incidence of recurrent iMN was 44%, and recurrences occurred at a median time of 13.6 months after transplantation. Two patterns of recurrence were identified: Early and late. No predictors of recurrence or disease progression could be identified. Treatment with rituximab was effective in four of four patients in stabilizing or reducing proteinuria and stabilizing renal function. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence of iMN is common even in the era of modern immunosuppression. Rituximab seems to be a valuable treatment option for these patients, although lager studies are needed to confirm our data.
Authors: P Maisonneuve; L Agodoa; R Gellert; J H Stewart; G Buccianti; A B Lowenfels; R A Wolfe; E Jones; A P Disney; D Briggs; M McCredie; P Boyle Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Laurence H Beck; Ramon G B Bonegio; Gérard Lambeau; David M Beck; David W Powell; Timothy D Cummins; Jon B Klein; David J Salant Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-07-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J P Cosyns; Y Pirson; J P Squifflet; G P Alexandre; C van Ypersele de Strihou; V W Pinn; S J Sweet; K S Shapiro; S Cho; J T Harrington Journal: Kidney Int Date: 1982-08 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Laurence H Beck; Fernando C Fervenza; David M Beck; Ramon G B Bonegio; Fahim A Malik; Stephen B Erickson; Fernando G Cosio; Daniel C Cattran; David J Salant Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-07-22 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: A Kattah; R Ayalon; L H Beck; S Sethi; D G Sandor; F G Cosio; M J Gandhi; E C Lorenz; D J Salant; F C Fervenza Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 8.086