Literature DB >> 20185218

Theorising big IT programmes in healthcare: strong structuration theory meets actor-network theory.

Trisha Greenhalgh1, Rob Stones.   

Abstract

The UK National Health Service is grappling with various large and controversial IT programmes. We sought to develop a sharper theoretical perspective on the question "What happens - at macro-, meso- and micro-level - when government tries to modernise a health service with the help of big IT?" Using examples from data fragments at the micro-level of clinical work, we considered how structuration theory and actor-network theory (ANT) might be combined to inform empirical investigation. Giddens (1984) argued that social structures and human agency are recursively linked and co-evolve. ANT studies the relationships that link people and technologies in dynamic networks. It considers how discourses become inscribed in data structures and decision models of software, making certain network relations irreversible. Stones' (2005) strong structuration theory (SST) is a refinement of Giddens' work, systematically concerned with empirical research. It views human agents as linked in dynamic networks of position-practices. A quadripartite approcach considers [a] external social structures (conditions for action); [b] internal social structures (agents' capabilities and what they 'know' about the social world); [c] active agency and actions and [d] outcomes as they feed back on the position-practice network. In contrast to early structuration theory and ANT, SST insists on disciplined conceptual methodology and linking this with empirical evidence. In this paper, we adapt SST for the study of technology programmes, integrating elements from material interactionism and ANT. We argue, for example, that the position-practice network can be a socio-technical one in which technologies in conjunction with humans can be studied as 'actants'. Human agents, with their complex socio-cultural frames, are required to instantiate technology in social practices. Structurally relevant properties inscribed and embedded in technological artefacts constrain and enable human agency. The fortunes of healthcare IT programmes might be studied in terms of the interplay between these factors. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20185218     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  58 in total

1.  Why national eHealth programs need dead philosophers: Wittgensteinian reflections on policymakers' reluctance to learn from history.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Jill Russell; Richard E Ashcroft; Wayne Parsons
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  The case for randomized controlled trials to assess the impact of clinical information systems.

Authors:  Joseph L Y Liu; Jeremy C Wyatt
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Samantha Adams Festschrift: Sam Adams and the Social Construction of Technology and Health-Implications for Biomedical Informatics.

Authors:  Laurie L Novak; Craig Kuziemsky; Bonnie Kaplan
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Evaluating WHO Healthy Cities in Europe: issues and perspectives.

Authors:  Evelyne de Leeuw
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 5.  Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: a systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Henry W W Potts; Geoff Wong; Pippa Bark; Deborah Swinglehurst
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  A personally controlled electronic health record for Australia.

Authors:  Christopher Pearce; Michael Bainbridge
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Opening the black box of quality improvement collaboratives: an Actor-Network theory approach.

Authors:  Tineke Broer; Anna P Nieboer; Roland A Bal
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Adoption, non-adoption, and abandonment of a personal electronic health record: case study of HealthSpace.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Susan Hinder; Katja Stramer; Tanja Bratan; Jill Russell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-11-16

9.  Actor-Network Theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare.

Authors:  Kathrin M Cresswell; Allison Worth; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Why do evaluations of eHealth programs fail? An alternative set of guiding principles.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Jill Russell
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.