Literature DB >> 20184637

Current practice in bowel preparation for colorectal surgery: a survey of the members of the Association of Coloproctology of GB & Ireland.

R J Drummond1, R M McKenna, D M Wright.   

Abstract

AIM: Recent meta-analyses have suggested that mechanical bowel preparation is not beneficial in patients undergoing colorectal resection. This study aimed to assess current surgical practice in the UK.
METHOD: Three hundred and ninety-eight members of the Association of Coloproctology of GB & Ireland were invited to complete an online survey to ascertain their current practice for bowel preparation.
RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-nine surgeons completed the survey, of whom 95 (48%) routinely performed laparoscopic resection. The proportions using full bowel preparation for open vs laparoscopic surgery were, respectively, 9.5%vs 16.8% for right hemicolectomy, 43.4%vs 40.2% for left hemicolectomy, 20.5%vs 22.5% for an abdominoperineal resection and 72.2%vs 63.6% for low anterior resection. Among the surgeons who participated, 13.6% changed their practice between doing the same procedure open and laparoscopically, 76% of surgeons routinely defunctioned a low anterior resection. Of these, 22% did not feel that full bowel preparation was necessary before formation of an ileostomy.
CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that a large proportion of patients still receive full bowel preparation despite recent advice to the contrary.
© 2011 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2011 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20184637     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02243.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  7 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Cao; J Li; F Li
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Laparoscopic colon resection: To prep or not to prep? Analysis of 1535 patients.

Authors:  Marco Ettore Allaix; Simone Arolfo; Maurizio Degiuli; Giuseppe Giraudo; Silvio Volpatto; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic colorectal resections with and without routine mechanical bowel preparation: A comparative study.

Authors:  Miu Yee Chan; Chi Chung Foo; Jensen Tung Chung Poon; Wai Lun Law
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2016-07-06

4.  ERAS protocol in laparoscopic surgery for colonic versus rectal carcinoma: are there differences in short-term outcomes?

Authors:  Michał Pędziwiatr; Magdalena Pisarska; Michał Kisielewski; Piotr Major; Anna Mydlowska; Mateusz Rubinkiewicz; Marek Winiarski; Andrzej Budzyński
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Current practice patterns of preoperative bowel preparation in colorectal surgery: a nation-wide survey by the Chinese Society of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Zheng Liu; Ming Yang; Zhi-Xun Zhao; Xu Guan; Zheng Jiang; Hai-Peng Chen; Song Wang; Ji-Chuan Quan; Run-Kun Yang; Xi-Shan Wang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Does Mechanical Bowel Preparation Ameliorate Surgical Performance in Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion?

Authors:  Chang-Hoon Jeon; Han-Dong Lee; Nam-Su Chung
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-01-23

7.  Impact of mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katie E Rollins; Hannah Javanmard-Emamghissi; Dileep N Lobo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.