UNLABELLED: INTRODUCTION/AIM OF THE STUDY: To assess the influence of a multidisciplinary approach on the limb salvage rates in the treatment of patients suffering from diabetic ischaemic inferior limb ulcers. MATERIALS & METHOD: From September 2001 until March 2008, a consecutive series of 183 limbs with diabetic ischaemic wounds in 163 patients were treated by combined multi-level angioplasties as the primary revascularization approach in an institutional diabetic programme (two departmental hospitals). The avoidance of limb loss was retrospectively analyzed before and after the year 2005, as a landmark for implementing a "multidisciplinary diabetic foot clinic" in the routine daily care. RESULTS: Initial technical success for endovascular revascularization was noted in 152 limbs (83%). The aggregate limb salvage proportions at 12, 24, 32, 60 and 66 months (+/- SEM) were: 87% (+/- 2.8), 80% (+/- 3.9), 77% (+/- 4.4) and thereafter 77% (+/- 4.4), respectively. A comparison between the limb salvage rates before and after initiating the multidisciplinary group showed a significant difference (p = 0.040, CI: 1.040-5.311, HR: 2.35, Chi square = 4.22) with better results in the latest interval, employing effective team activity. No statistical deviation was found regarding the technique itself for revascularization at the same intervals (p = 0.381). CONCLUSION: Our experience suggests that limb salvage for diabetic ischaemic wounds may be favourably influenced by a co-ordinated multidisciplinary group. Although appropriate revascularization is crucial for limb rescue, a pluralist control of the attending risk factors influencing wound healing might be of matchless importance as well.
UNLABELLED: INTRODUCTION/AIM OF THE STUDY: To assess the influence of a multidisciplinary approach on the limb salvage rates in the treatment of patients suffering from diabetic ischaemic inferior limb ulcers. MATERIALS & METHOD: From September 2001 until March 2008, a consecutive series of 183 limbs with diabetic ischaemic wounds in 163 patients were treated by combined multi-level angioplasties as the primary revascularization approach in an institutional diabetic programme (two departmental hospitals). The avoidance of limb loss was retrospectively analyzed before and after the year 2005, as a landmark for implementing a "multidisciplinary diabetic foot clinic" in the routine daily care. RESULTS: Initial technical success for endovascular revascularization was noted in 152 limbs (83%). The aggregate limb salvage proportions at 12, 24, 32, 60 and 66 months (+/- SEM) were: 87% (+/- 2.8), 80% (+/- 3.9), 77% (+/- 4.4) and thereafter 77% (+/- 4.4), respectively. A comparison between the limb salvage rates before and after initiating the multidisciplinary group showed a significant difference (p = 0.040, CI: 1.040-5.311, HR: 2.35, Chi square = 4.22) with better results in the latest interval, employing effective team activity. No statistical deviation was found regarding the technique itself for revascularization at the same intervals (p = 0.381). CONCLUSION: Our experience suggests that limb salvage for diabetic ischaemic wounds may be favourably influenced by a co-ordinated multidisciplinary group. Although appropriate revascularization is crucial for limb rescue, a pluralist control of the attending risk factors influencing wound healing might be of matchless importance as well.