Literature DB >> 20184048

The Immediate Management of the Patient with Rupture: Open Versus Endovascular repair (IMPROVE) aneurysm trial--ISRCTN 48334791 IMPROVE trialists.

J T Powell, S G Thompson, M M Thompson, R Grieve, A A Nicholson, R Ashleigh, T Hassan, F Moore, A Walker, B D Braithwaite, R J Hinchliffe, R M Greenhalgh, N J Cheshire, S J Howell, C V Soong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews have suggested a survival advantage for patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), who are managed by endovascular repair. These reviews are based on single centre experiences of selected patients.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a policy of endovascular repair improves the survival of all patients with ruptured AAA.
METHODS: A randomized controlled trial, IMPROVE (ISRCTN 48334791) will randomize patients with a clinical diagnosis of rAAA, made in hospital, either to immediate CT scan and endovascular repair whenever anatomically suitable (endovascular first), or to open repair, with CT scan being optional (normal care), The trial is set on a background of guidelines for emergency care, CT scanning and anaesthesia, which incorporate the protocol of permissive hypotension. Recruitment started in October 2009 and 600 patients are required to show a 14% survival benefit at 30 days (primary outcome) for the endovascular first policy. Recruitment will be from the UK and Europe. Secondary outcomes include 24h, in-hospital and 1 year survival, complications, major morbidities, costs and quality of life. DISCUSSION: This is a "real life" trial that will answer the fundamental relevant clinical dilemma, namely, do patients who present with ruptured AAA derive benefit from treatment in a system, which offers a preferential strategy of endovascular repair? The trial addresses whether the anticipated reduced mortality and morbidity associated with endovascular repair is offset by the relatively greater ease of access and speed to conventional surgery. This issue is pivotal to future patient care and provision of services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20184048     DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2009.11680516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Chir Belg        ISSN: 0001-5458            Impact factor:   1.090


  5 in total

Review 1.  Endovascular Treatment versus Open Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: The Influence of Fitness in Decision Making.

Authors:  Konstnatinos G Moulakakis; Ilias Dalainas; John Kakisis; Spyridon Mylonas; Christos D Liapis
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2013-03

Review 2.  Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

Authors:  Andrew England; Richard Mc Williams
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2013-01

Review 3.  Endovascular repair or open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a Cochrane systematic review.

Authors:  S A Badger; D W Harkin; P H Blair; P K Ellis; F Kee; R Forster
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Long-term safety and efficacy of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Brandon W Propper; Christopher J Abularrage
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2013-04-03

Review 5.  Emergent endovascular vs. open surgery repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chuan Qin; Lin Chen; Ying-bin Xiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.