Literature DB >> 20183130

The influence of flow cell geometry related shear stresses on the distribution, structure and susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa 01 biofilms.

M Mehdi Salek1, Steven M Jones, Robert J Martinuzzi.   

Abstract

The effects of non-uniform hydrodynamic conditions resulting from flow cell geometry (square and rectangular cross-section) on Pseudomonas aeruginosa 01 (PAO1) biofilm formation, location, and structure were investigated for nominally similar flow conditions using a combination of confocal scanning laser microscope (CSLM) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The thickness and surface coverage of PAO1 biofilms were observed to vary depending on the location in the flow cell and thus also the local wall shear stress. The biofilm structure in a 5:1 (width to height) aspect ratio rectangular flow cell was observed to consist mainly of a layer of bacterial cells with thicker biofilm formation observed in the flow cell corners. For square cross-section (1:1 aspect ratio) flow cells, generally thicker and more uniform surface coverage biofilms were observed. Mushroom shaped structures with hollow centers and wall breaks, indicative of 'seeding' dispersal structures, were found exclusively in the square cross-section tubes. Exposure of PAO1 biofilms grown in the flow cells to gentamicin revealed a difference in susceptibility. Biofilms grown in the rectangular flow cell overall exhibited a greater susceptibility to gentamicin compared to those grown in square flow cells. However, even within a given flow cell, differences in susceptibility were observed depending on location. This study demonstrates that the spanwise shear stress distribution within the flow cells has an important impact on the location of colonization and structure of the resultant biofilm. These differences in biofilm structure have a significant impact on the susceptibility of the biofilms grown within flow channels. The impact of flow modification due to flow cell geometry should be considered when designing flow cells for laboratory investigation of bacterial biofilms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20183130     DOI: 10.1080/08927010903114603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofouling        ISSN: 0892-7014            Impact factor:   3.209


  10 in total

1.  Fluorescent silica particles for monitoring oxygen levels in three-dimensional heterogeneous cellular structures.

Authors:  Miguel A Acosta; Melissa Velasquez; Katelyn Williams; Julia M Ross; Jennie B Leach
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Competition between growth and shear stress drives intermittency in preferential flow paths in porous medium biofilms.

Authors:  Dorothee L Kurz; Eleonora Secchi; Francisco J Carrillo; Ian C Bourg; Roman Stocker; Joaquin Jimenez-Martinez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Filaments in curved streamlines: Rapid formation of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm streamers.

Authors:  Minyoung Kevin Kim; Knut Drescher; On Shun Pak; Bonnie L Bassler; Howard A Stone
Journal:  New J Phys       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.729

4.  Robustness analysis of culturing perturbations on Escherichia coli colony biofilm beta-lactam and aminoglycoside antibiotic tolerance.

Authors:  Trevor R Zuroff; Hans Bernstein; Jenna Lloyd-Randolfi; Lourdes Jimenez-Taracido; Philip S Stewart; Ross P Carlson
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.605

5.  In situ spatiotemporal mapping of flow fields around seeded stem cells at the subcellular length scale.

Authors:  Min Jae Song; David Dean; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Viscoelasticity of biofilms and their recalcitrance to mechanical and chemical challenges.

Authors:  Brandon W Peterson; Yan He; Yijin Ren; Aidan Zerdoum; Matthew R Libera; Prashant K Sharma; Arie-Jan van Winkelhoff; Danielle Neut; Paul Stoodley; Henny C van der Mei; Henk J Busscher
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 16.408

Review 7.  Microfluidic approaches to bacterial biofilm formation.

Authors:  Junghyun Kim; Hee-Deung Park; Seok Chung
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  The Mechanical Analysis of the Biofilm Streamer Nucleation and Geometry Characterization in Microfluidic Channels.

Authors:  Xiaoling Wang; Mudong Hao; Xin Du; Guoqing Wang; Jun-Ichi Matsushita
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 2.238

9.  Antibiofilm Properties of Temporin-L on Pseudomonas fluorescens in Static and In-Flow Conditions.

Authors:  Angela Di Somma; Federica Recupido; Arianna Cirillo; Alessia Romano; Alessandra Romanelli; Sergio Caserta; Stefano Guido; Angela Duilio
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  A new BiofilmChip device for testing biofilm formation and antibiotic susceptibility.

Authors:  Núria Blanco-Cabra; Maria José López-Martínez; Betsy Verónica Arévalo-Jaimes; María Teresa Martin-Gómez; Josep Samitier; Eduard Torrents
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 7.290

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.